Please don't top post.
http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html
--
Cheers
Jayesh Badwaik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I've noticed more issues than usual in the last few weeks as well. Including
one big issue that prevented my whole system from booting (just a black screen
with flashing cursor, not even a command prompt let alone my lightdm login
screen). I didn't file bug reports for those, since I am very bus
On 26.07.2016 03:23, Oon-Ee Ng via arch-general wrote:
> 1. What exactly can these users do? I assume simply sign-off as 'works for me'
> 2. Is there any hard deadline?
> 3. (related to above) is there any policy as to what specifically a
> user should have tested before signing off? Starting at le
As Florian just sent out the arch-dev-public email on this topic (and
I can't reply there), I have a couple of questions.
1. What exactly can these users do? I assume simply sign-off as 'works for me'
2. Is there any hard deadline?
3. (related to above) is there any policy as to what specifically
On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 09:16 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> This sounds like the Fedora policy where packages have to surpass a
> certain karma level to move into the main repositories. I'm not sure
> who gets to vote for that though.
>
> A
I would suggest allowing any Arch user vote yay or nay
Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:51:17 +0200
Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public :
> Maybe we should look into finding some people that want to help test
> stuff and give them permissions to sign off on packages?
+1
Sign me up, running [testing] for a decade now anyway, on x86_64 and
i686.
--byte
pgpOmTnKTxl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:51:17 +0200
Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> As pointed out on arch-general (not by me) this makes the whole
> signoff process useless. Maybe we should look into finding some
> people that want to help test stuff and
Hey there,
At some point I started to receive those "signoff" message on one of the list
I'm subscribed to. I searched on the wiki what that meant, but with no result. I
see that on https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Official_repositories you
mention in one sentence what it is, but sorry it's not
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 07:36:49AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Excepted of issues that happen, if upstream decides to make a change of
> course, as e.g. gtk or qt did, I couldn't notice more issues as usual.
Same here, no more issues than usual, and I even run a bastard version of Arch
with my ow
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:28:10 -0700, Kyle Terrien via arch-general wrote:
>I have personally experienced several breakages in the past several
>months--more than usual. A few were big enough that simply running
>'foo - --version' should have revealed a problem (i.e. linking
>problems). A signoff p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I am replying to arch-general because arch-dev-public is closed to most
users.
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:09:41 -1000
Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> For a while now packages in [testing] have gotten little to no
> signoffs and I've been moving m
11 matches
Mail list logo
