On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 16:39 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 19.05.2010 16:19, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler
>> > wrote:
>> >> Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
>> >>> Also did a diff
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 16:39 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 19.05.2010 16:19, schrieb Dan McGee:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler
> > wrote:
> >> Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> >>> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1
> >
Am 19.05.2010 16:19, schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
>>> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1
>>> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
>> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1
>> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has
>> indeed been added to the linux-firmware re
Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1
> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has
> indeed been added to the linux-firmware repository, which should resolve
> FS#19519 [2].
I did that to
On 19/05/10 02:10, Thomas Bächler wrote:
This file lacks some conflicts/provides, but you should be able to
install it instead of kernel26-firmware.
http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/linux-firmware-git-20100519-1-any.pkg.tar.xz
Let me know what you think. Also, there have been some reports about
Am 19.05.2010 00:47, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Am 18.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nezmer:
>> FYI, I had this discussion with the radeon guys months ago in IRC.
>> Apparently, kernel guys (maybe Linus) decided to not add new firmware
>> files to the kernel tree. That's why we have all those firmware packa
Am 18.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nezmer:
> FYI, I had this discussion with the radeon guys months ago in IRC.
> Apparently, kernel guys (maybe Linus) decided to not add new firmware
> files to the kernel tree. That's why we have all those firmware packages
> for in-tree modules.
So, they ship firmware
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Nezmer wrote:
> FYI, I had this discussion with the radeon guys months ago in IRC.
> Apparently, kernel guys (maybe Linus) decided to not add new firmware
> files to the kernel tree. That's why we have all those firmware packages
> for in-tree modules.
Depending
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:28:43PM +0200, Thomas B?chler wrote:
> Am 18.05.2010 16:06, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> > In particular, notice Alex's reply stating:
> >
> > --8<
> > In general, microcode is slowly being moved out of
Am Tue, 18 May 2010 17:55:12 +0200
schrieb Thomas Bächler :
> > However, these firmware files are needed for R600/R700/Evergreen
> > cards [1], therefore I see two options:
> >
> > 1) radeon_ucode [2] can be brought to [extra] and an announcement
> > added to the front page informing users about
Am 18.05.2010 17:26, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> I see your point. It seems that upstream kernel developers don't wish to
> ship firmware files, which is... not ideal for downstream (e.g. Arch).
That is weird. Many other firmware files are being shipped with Linux
and it would make sense here.
>
On 18/05/10 17:28, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 18.05.2010 16:06, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
In particular, notice Alex's reply stating:
--8<
In general, microcode is slowly being moved out of the kernel and into
the Linux firmware
Am 18.05.2010 16:06, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> In particular, notice Alex's reply stating:
>
> --8<
> In general, microcode is slowly being moved out of the kernel and into
> the Linux firmware tree:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=
On 17/05/10 22:24, Mauro Santos wrote:
I have noticed that if I don't have radeon_ucode [1] installed then
early or late KMS don't work and I get just a black screen. However I
didn't wait 1 minute to check if after a while the boot process resumes.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3
The new manpages package needs "xmlto" as makedepend.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> kernel 2.6.34 first test run ...
>
> Upstream changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests:
> # added manpages and documents a
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 08:10 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> > Am Mon, 17 May 2010 08:23:15 -0600
> > schrieb Ignacio Galmarino :
> >
> >> ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
> >>
> >> x86_64
> >>
> >> Ignacio
> >>
> >
> > Works for
You are right, sorry. I should not make a report when im in a hurry.
Ignacio
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Mon, 17 May 2010 08:23:15 -0600
> schrieb Ignacio Galmarino :
>
> > ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
> >
> > x86_64
> >
> > Ignacio
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> kernel 2.6.34 first test run ...
>
> ...
Enjoy have fun and give me feedback,
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
* Ignacio Galmarino [17.05.2010 16:23]:
> ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
>
> x86_64
>
> Ignacio
ATI KMS is working fine here on i686 with radeon
% lspci | grep ATI
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon
9600 M10]
But I'll c
On 05/17/2010 08:10 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Mon, 17 May 2010 08:23:15 -0600
> schrieb Ignacio Galmarino :
>
>> ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
>>
>> x86_64
>>
>> Ignacio
>>
>
> Works for me. Probably as useful as your report...
>
> -Andy
>
I have noticed that
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Mon, 17 May 2010 08:23:15 -0600
> schrieb Ignacio Galmarino :
>
>> ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
>>
>> x86_64
>>
>> Ignacio
>>
>
> Works for me. Probably as useful as your report...
Working fine for me too:
$
Am Mon, 17 May 2010 08:23:15 -0600
schrieb Ignacio Galmarino :
> ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
>
> x86_64
>
> Ignacio
>
Works for me. Probably as useful as your report...
-Andy
ATI KMS is not working. All i get is garbage on the screen.
x86_64
Ignacio
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> kernel 2.6.34 first test run ...
>
> Upstream changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests:
> # added m
24 matches
Mail list logo
