Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-12 Thread Alexander Lam
I have an Acer aspire one (945gse) and I don't have these problemsbut perhaps a temporary workaround is to set the module parameter powersave = 0 i915.powersave=0 On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Daenyth Blank > > > wrote: > > On Mon

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-07 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 17:01, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> This is on the intel-gfx list and has been replied to by one of the devs. >> >> > > Sweet :D > actually, the thread is dead silent since my melt-your-cpu-git-bisecting result but I keep

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-07 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 17:01, Thomas Bächler wrote: > This is on the intel-gfx list and has been replied to by one of the devs. > > Sweet :D

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-07 Thread Thomas Bächler
Daenyth Blank schrieb: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 08:42, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: Just FTR, I have bisected the issue and found out this commit was to blame: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=181a5336d6cc836f05507410d66988c483ad0154 I've reverted it and reb

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-07 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 08:42, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > Just FTR, I have bisected the issue and found out this commit was to blame: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=181a5336d6cc836f05507410d66988c483ad0154 > > I've reverted it and rebuilt 2.6.32. Issue

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-07 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Roman Kyrylych wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 18:29, Emmanuel Benisty >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler >>> wrote: What's your chipset? Allan's chipset? No such issues here on 945GM. >>> >>> Integ

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Xavier wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty >>> wrote: On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > Thomas Bächler wrot

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Allan McRae
Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Xavier wrote: On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote: Thomas Bächler wrote: Allan McRae schrieb: That works for me. I initially thought it was strange that it came

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Allan McRae
Roman Kyrylych wrote: On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 18:29, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: What's your chipset? Allan's chipset? No such issues here on 945GM. Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965GM I have the same chipset. No issues. Same chi

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Xavier wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >>> Thomas Bächler wrote: Allan McRae schrieb: > > That works for me.  I initially thought it was strange that it came

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> Thomas Bächler wrote: >>> >>> Allan McRae schrieb: That works for me.  I initially thought it was strange that it came on but now I see why.  extreme-tuxracer is giving

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Chris Bannister
Whats the plan re devtmpfs ? 2009/12/5 Roman Kyrylych : > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 18:29, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >>> What's your chipset? Allan's chipset? No such issues here on 945GM. >> >> Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965GM > >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 18:29, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> What's your chipset? Allan's chipset? No such issues here on 945GM. > > Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965GM I have the same chipset. No issues. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кир

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Emmanuel Benisty schrieb: >>> >>> With KMS on, my screen flickers every 20sec or so.  Tried with no >>> xorg.conf >>> and the same thing.  I even got some sort of yellow/orange screen of >>> death. >>>  I did not use KMS with 2.6.31 so this

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
Emmanuel Benisty schrieb: With KMS on, my screen flickers every 20sec or so. Tried with no xorg.conf and the same thing. I even got some sort of yellow/orange screen of death. I did not use KMS with 2.6.31 so this may not be kernel related. I'll look into it later but disabling kms from the g

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Thomas Bächler wrote: >> >> Allan McRae schrieb: >>> >>> That works for me.  I initially thought it was strange that it came on >>> but now I see why.  extreme-tuxracer is giving me (>50%) more FPS with this >>> update. >> >> Intel DRM has been

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Nezmer
> >> If Arch wants to be (disk)size-effective, We would end up with hundreds >> of Debian-like *-{header,dev} packages. > > We're not going to do that, it just seemed insane to include this stuff in > the kernel. > >> I just don't think splitting header packages is practical with distributions >>

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
nez...@allurelinux.org schrieb: On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Attila wrote: At Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 09:56 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: Isn't it against Arch philosophy to split packages it binary and header packages? First the headers from the kernel package was even a reduced amoun

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Nezmer
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Attila wrote: > At Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 09:56 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > > > Isn't it against Arch philosophy to split packages it binary and header > > packages? > > First the headers from the kernel package was even a reduced amount and if > you >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Attila
At Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 09:56 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > Isn't it against Arch philosophy to split packages it binary and header > packages? First the headers from the kernel package was even a reduced amount and if you look in the PKGBUILD only for the cases if you build some packages for yo

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 09:31 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Samstag 05 Dezember 2009 09:00:38 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > > - splitted kernel-headers to extra package > > If you want to build external modules please install: > > pacman -S kernel26-headers > > Please change your PKGBUILDS t