Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-19 Thread David J. Haines
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:10:15AM +0300, Greg Bouzakis wrote: > Leonid Isaev wrote: > > > On 10/16/2012 08:21 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > >> [2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev: > >>> I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default > network backend > >>> in arch) because it is far b

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-18 Thread Greg Bouzakis
Leonid Isaev wrote: > On 10/16/2012 08:21 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: >> [2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev: >>> I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default network backend >>> in arch) because it is far better than the alternatives :) I don't think >>> that wpa_supplicant/crda be

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-18 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-10-18 15:15:02 -0400] Leonid Isaev: > On 10/16/2012 08:21 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > > >Since routers do not need netcfg any more than they do wpa_supplicant, > >with your reasoning, it should not be in base either... > > > > YMMV apparently, but in my experience a router needs: > (1) Some

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-18 Thread Leonid Isaev
On 10/16/2012 08:21 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev: I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default network backend in arch) because it is far better than the alternatives :) I don't think that wpa_supplicant/crda belongs in base (for instance routers d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-16 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev: > I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default network backend in > arch) because it is far better than the alternatives :) I don't think that > wpa_supplicant/crda belongs in base (for instance routers don't need > wpa_supplicant but may require

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-16 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:22:05 +0200 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 16.10.2012 14:05, schrieb Joakim Hernberg: > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200 > > Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > >> I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really > >> want wireless support installed by default.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-16 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 16.10.2012 14:05, schrieb Joakim Hernberg: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200 > Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really >> want wireless support installed by default. > > Not that I install many systems, once installed... But I for one

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base

2012-10-16 Thread Joakim Hernberg
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200 Thomas Bächler wrote: > I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really > want wireless support installed by default. Not that I install many systems, once installed... But I for one would appreciate having wireless support on the install m