Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] fontconfig 2.10.1 will require user interaction

On 2012/9/6 Allan McRae wrote: > On 06/09/12 18:20, Heiko Baums wrote: > > Am Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:06:57 +0200 > > schrieb Andreas Radke : > > > >> Pacman will detect the symlinks and break before the install scriptlet > >> will be run. So this is not an option. > > > > Did you test it? > > > > I'm

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] fontconfig 2.10.1 will require user interaction

On 06/09/12 18:20, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:06:57 +0200 > schrieb Andreas Radke : > >> Pacman will detect the symlinks and break before the install scriptlet >> will be run. So this is not an option. > > Did you test it? > > I'm pretty sure it won't, since I tested this before

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] fontconfig 2.10.1 will require user interaction

Am Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:06:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke : > Pacman will detect the symlinks and break before the install scriptlet > will be run. So this is not an option. Did you test it? I'm pretty sure it won't, since I tested this before in one of my AUR packages. Well, it was the removal of

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] fontconfig 2.10.1 will require user interaction

Am Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:59:07 +0200 schrieb Heiko Baums : > Wouldn't it be possible and make sense to remove those in the > pre_install() or pre_upgrade() functions of the new packages? > > Heiko > Pacman will detect the symlinks and break before the install scriptlet will be run. So this is not

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] fontconfig 2.10.1 will require user interaction

Am Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:25:06 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke : > Am Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:02:27 +0200 > schrieb Rémy Oudompheng : > > > I would simply recommend removing the offending files using rm, we > > certainly know the list. > > > > Rémy. > > > > News draft: > > fontconfig 2.10.1 update - manu