Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM Tom Gundersen wrote: > [...] > > I adopted this with the intention of killing it. Let me know if there are > objections. > > As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if > anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. Is

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:23:40 +0200 schrieb Seblu : > Currently i removed the last kernel version dot in linux-tools to > avoid user confusion between stable kernel number and linux-tools > version. I manually check if stable release embed fix for cpupower and > perf to avoid user to update when no

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 19.04.2012 01:21, schrieb Seblu: >>> As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if >>> anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. >> >> If you move linux-tools source package into core/extra it m

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.04.2012 01:21, schrieb Seblu: >> As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if >> anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. > > If you move linux-tools source package into core/extra it make sense > to merge it with linux package. This would force

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-18 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:58:09 +0200 schrieb Tom Gundersen : > I agree it would make sense to make it a split package with the > kernel as the source is shipped with the kernel (afaiu). I missed that Seblu meant this. This would, indeed, make sense. Heiko

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-18 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Apr 19, 2012 1:47 AM, "Heiko Baums" wrote: > > Am Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:21:46 +0200 > schrieb Seblu : > > > If you move linux-tools source package into core/extra it make sense > > to merge it with linux package. > > What sense does this make? The package linux is the kernel, the package > linux-

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-18 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:21:46 +0200 schrieb Seblu : > If you move linux-tools source package into core/extra it make sense > to merge it with linux package. What sense does this make? The package linux is the kernel, the package linux-tools are kernel tools which are not necessary to be able to us

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-18 Thread Seblu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Apr 18, 2012 10:41 AM, "Thomas Bächler" wrote: >> >> Am 08.04.2012 18:08, schrieb Leonid Isaev: >> > Hi, >> > >> >       Cpufrequtils 008 in [core] has long been orphaned and, as you > know, >> > actually deprecated upstream since linux

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-18 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Apr 18, 2012 10:41 AM, "Thomas Bächler" wrote: > > Am 08.04.2012 18:08, schrieb Leonid Isaev: > > Hi, > > > > Cpufrequtils 008 in [core] has long been orphaned and, as you know, > > actually deprecated upstream since linux 3.1 > > (http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1). Instead, there is cp