Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-07 Thread Vesa Kaihlavirta
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:35:14AM +0200, Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote: >> >> I talked with Angel on IRC and we decided to work on wicd together and >> keep it in extra for now. Angel, do you concur? >> >> And there's a brand new wicd-1.5.8-1 f

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-06 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:35:14AM +0200, Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote: > > I talked with Angel on IRC and we decided to work on wicd together and > keep it in extra for now. Angel, do you concur? > > And there's a brand new wicd-1.5.8-1 for both arches in testing. > Thanks for keeping it in extra. Is

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-04 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:50:23PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> > PS, another hug to Sergej for rebuilding ALL of his packages :) >> > >> Correction, turns out Sergej didnt rebuild all his packages. Just some >> of them were built by other

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-04 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:50:23PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > PS, another hug to Sergej for rebuilding ALL of his packages :) > > > Correction, turns out Sergej didnt rebuild all his packages. Just some > of them were built by other people. > > Libpcap rebuild results: approximately 6 p

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-04 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
> PS, another hug to Sergej for rebuilding ALL of his packages :) > Correction, turns out Sergej didnt rebuild all his packages. Just some of them were built by other people. Libpcap rebuild results: approximately 6 packages have been rebuilt, while 5 havent. Greg pgpaQPkO2wQ2X.pgp Description

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-04 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:04:03PM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote: > >> > >> This thread is started by Eduardo 'kensai' who told that WICD is up > >> for grabs, he wrote

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-04 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote: >> >> This thread is started by Eduardo 'kensai' who told that WICD is up >> for grabs, he wrote that in arch-dev-public, and since no-dev seemed >> interested, I replied i

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-04 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote: > > This thread is started by Eduardo 'kensai' who told that WICD is up > for grabs, he wrote that in arch-dev-public, and since no-dev seemed > interested, I replied in this list, is that a crime?. > No, but you replied to a discuss

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-04 Thread Angel Velásquez
> > IMO it should stay in extra. Its the only decent alternative to netcfg > if you dont want to use GNOME or KDE. In my opinion should be in extra too, but if remains in extra and nobody grab it, it will get more out-of-date. > And plus its not that out of date, just a sub-version behind. Probab

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-03 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/1/3, Grigorios Bouzakis : > Anyway, i just think that a GUI alternative to netcfg should be > available in official > repos for people who dont use GNOME or KDE. I think that a GUI alternative to netcfg is not indispensable. -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR & Pacman Italian Transl

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-03 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2009/1/3, Grigorios Bouzakis : >> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:40:58AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote: >> > The package is actually out of date, I asked for maintain this package >> > in community if it's possible, in fact I built a version f

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-03 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/1/3, Grigorios Bouzakis : > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:40:58AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote: > > The package is actually out of date, I asked for maintain this package > > in community if it's possible, in fact I built a version from myself, > > I have the PKGBUILD if someone want to test i

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-03 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:40:58AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote: > The package is actually out of date, I asked for maintain this package > in community if it's possible, in fact I built a version from myself, > I have the PKGBUILD if someone want to test it. > IMO it should stay in extra. Its th

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-03 Thread Angel Velásquez
The package is actually out of date, I asked for maintain this package in community if it's possible, in fact I built a version from myself, I have the PKGBUILD if someone want to test it. Cheers -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909 Arch Linux Trusted User

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2008-12-06 Thread Avramucz Péter
Thanks! I use this package. On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Angel Velásquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Eduardo Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, I have updated wicd quite a few times already, since I was using >> it to test something in my network. I had

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2008-12-05 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Eduardo Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I have updated wicd quite a few times already, since I was using > it to test something in my network. I had my few share of bugs opened > for wicd, but now, they are all closed, hopefully, closed and dead. But, > wel