Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoff kernel26-2.6.24.3-6

2008-03-26 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 16:58 bardo wrote: > Come on, Jan, you know this wasn't the message. It has already been > stated that patching *is* allowed (I'd say encouraged) when needed, > which means when there's breakage upstream. The point was about > superfluous patches, like those that add new

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoff kernel26-2.6.24.3-6

2008-03-26 Thread Alessio Bolognino
On Wed 2008-03-26 16:46 , Jan de Groot wrote: > [...] > If patching is no longer allowed, get ready for a time where packages are > stuck in testing for ages because upstream broke it. Get ready to run a distro > that breaks your system on every pacman -Syu because upgrade paths are not > handled.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoff kernel26-2.6.24.3-6

2008-03-26 Thread bardo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If patching is no longer allowed, get ready for a time where packages are > stuck in testing for ages because upstream broke it. Get ready to run a > distro that breaks your system on every pacman -Syu because upgrade pat