Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-23 Thread Tom Gundersen
In that case, ignore my email :-) I must have remembered wrong... Sorry for the noise. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote: > On 02/23/2011 07:31 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroong >>  wrote: >>> >>> No sign off from me (x86_64). >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-23 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 02/23/2011 07:31 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote: No sign off from me (x86_64). After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version 2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system won't show up on /

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-23 Thread KESHAV P.R.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote: > No sign off from me (x86_64). > > After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version > 2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system > won't show up on /etc/mtab after you mount them. > > Do

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-23 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote: > No sign off from me (x86_64). > > After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version > 2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system > won't show up on /etc/mtab after you mount them. > >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-23 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 02/22/2011 08:41 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 02/22/2011 02:13 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 22.02.2011 12:35, schrieb Ionuț Bîru: Hi, The util-linux-ng project has been renamed back to util-linux. Why 2.19-3? Shouldn't it be -1? be

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-22 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Ionuț Bîru [22.02.2011 14:43]: > On 02/22/2011 03:41 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote: > >I did get the following output when I updated. > > > >Proceed with installation? [Y/n] > >:: Retrieving packages from testing... > > util-linux-2.19-2-i686 1388.8K 987.1K/s 00:00:01 > > the signoff

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-22 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 02/22/2011 03:41 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote: I did get the following output when I updated. Proceed with installation? [Y/n] :: Retrieving packages from testing... util-linux-2.19-2-i686 1388.8K 987.1K/s 00:00:01 the signoff is for 2.19-3 and you got 2.19-2. That bug was fixed

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-22 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 02/22/2011 02:41 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote: I did get the following output when I updated. Proceed with installation? [Y/n] :: Retrieving packages from testing... util-linux-2.19-2-i686 1388.8K 987.1K/s 00:00:01 This thread is for pkgrel 3 ;)

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-22 Thread Uli Armbruster
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 02/22/2011 02:13 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 22.02.2011 12:35, schrieb Ionuț Bîru: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The util-linux-ng project has been renamed back to util-linux. >>> >> >> Why 2.19-3? Shouldn't it be -1? >> > > because tpowa uploade