On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:11 +0100, Xavier wrote:
>> Why doesn't Arch ship that package ? It's a single 6 lines file, it
>> cannot hurt anything.
>> I just realized arch patches libdrm to not require it :
>> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packa
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:11:40PM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
> >> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
> >> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:11 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Why doesn't Arch ship that package ? It's a single 6 lines file, it
> cannot hurt anything.
> I just realized arch patches libdrm to not require it :
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/libdrm/repos/extra-i686/no-pthread-stubs.patch
> But of
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
>> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
>> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
>> and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
>
> W
Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
> and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
While you may be right, such tools must be able to handle packag
Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
6 matches
Mail list logo
