Eli Schwartz via arch-general writes:
> On 11/08/2016 08:03 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> Um, the Qt licensing is rather more complicated than that nowadays:
>> https://www.qt.io/licensing-comparison/
>>
>> I think it went something like (vastly simplified and not weighed down
>> by any sort of
On 11/08/2016 08:04 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Eli,
>
> it's not worth to contribute anything to such a naive request,
> with that much questionable replies.
Well, really, I just felt the need to rebut some silly points made by
one of those questionable replies. Although maybe I shouldn't have tri
On 11/08/2016 08:03 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Um, the Qt licensing is rather more complicated than that nowadays:
> https://www.qt.io/licensing-comparison/
>
> I think it went something like (vastly simplified and not weighed down
> by any sort of actual knowledge)
>
> 1. Trolltech used GPL o
Eli,
it's not worth to contribute anything to such a naive request,
with that much questionable replies.
I guess the OP already understands that it depends on the task what
environment to chose and that it's quite possible to tailor each
environment, even when installing a bundle. The latter migh
Eli Schwartz via arch-general writes:
> On 11/07/2016 07:39 PM, Christian Klaue wrote:
>> Back to the 3 major players:
>> . KDE looks close to Windows and fancy. QT is closed sw. In my personal
>> opinion KDE offers too many configurations (early plasma) and is been
>> laggy (KDE 4).
>
> Um, wh
On 11/07/2016 07:39 PM, Christian Klaue wrote:
> Back to the 3 major players:
> . KDE looks close to Windows and fancy. QT is closed sw. In my personal
> opinion KDE offers too many configurations (early plasma) and is been
> laggy (KDE 4).
Um, what???
Qt is dual-licensed under the GPL3 (with a
There is no "best enviroment" for everyone.
Ask for advantages / disadvantages. Check if the answers still apply
nowadays. Let's see for my personal opinion.
When I started with linux I started on cinnamon / mate since it is been
most closely to windows. It's also been as buggy as windows. Back
On 11/06/2016 04:12 PM, Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
> Hi, what the best desktop envieronment for archlinux? Only is the question.
>
> I like very much kde plasma but he used a lot of ram and sometimes it
> is very heavy. Do you think?
>
I agree with the remainder, the choice is yours
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:25:38AM +, Rijul Gulati via arch-general wrote:
> Its a matter of preference really. XFCE is lightweight. I myself use GNOME
> and XFCE (depends on my daily mood :P)
> If KDE is heavy for you, you could try XFCE.
>
> On Mon 7 Nov, 2016, 13:48 Ben Oliver via arch-gene
I use gnome myself. I am an orca user so gnome good for accessibility.
Mate is also good. There is a couple of things you have to odo to get
mate to work though gnome just works rite out of the box.
Matthew
On 11/06/2016 05:49 PM, Lukas Rose wrote:
On 06 Nov 2016, at 23:15, Bruno Pag
Here's to GNOME.
Am 07.11.2016 um 07:47 schrieb David Demelier via arch-general:
> Le 6 nov. 2016 11:12 PM, "Maykel Franco via arch-general" <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> a écrit :
>> Hi, what the best desktop envieronment for archlinux? Only is the
> question.
>> I like very much kde plasma bu
Its a matter of preference really. XFCE is lightweight. I myself use GNOME
and XFCE (depends on my daily mood :P)
If KDE is heavy for you, you could try XFCE.
On Mon 7 Nov, 2016, 13:48 Ben Oliver via arch-general, <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> I agree with all the above.
>
> XFCE is my g
I agree with all the above.
XFCE is my go-to when I need a lightweight and reliable DE.
Otherwise I'm strictly a WM guy - tried xmonad, liked it, but then
found out that i3 has the setup I was using as default, so I switched.
Plain text config files are also nice (although I imagine somewhat
limi
No such thing, but I've used i3, awesome, gnome classic, gnome shell and
xfce but my favorite has been KDE Plasma.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:47 AM, David Demelier via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Le 6 nov. 2016 11:12 PM, "Maykel Franco via arch-general" <
> arch-general@arch
Le 6 nov. 2016 11:12 PM, "Maykel Franco via arch-general" <
arch-general@archlinux.org> a écrit :
>
> Hi, what the best desktop envieronment for archlinux? Only is the
question.
>
> I like very much kde plasma but he used a lot of ram and sometimes it
> is very heavy. Do you think?
It's matter of
>> On 06 Nov 2016, at 23:15, Bruno Pagani wrote:
>>
>> Le 06/11/2016 à 23:12, Maykel Franco via arch-general a écrit :
>>
>> Hi, what the best desktop envieronment for archlinux? Only is the question.
>>
>> I like very much kde plasma but he used a lot of ram and sometimes it
>> is very heavy
Le 06/11/2016 à 23:12, Maykel Franco via arch-general a écrit :
> Hi, what the best desktop envieronment for archlinux? Only is the question.
>
> I like very much kde plasma but he used a lot of ram and sometimes it
> is very heavy. Do you think?
There is no such thing like “the best DE”. This is
Hi, what the best desktop envieronment for archlinux? Only is the question.
I like very much kde plasma but he used a lot of ram and sometimes it
is very heavy. Do you think?
18 matches
Mail list logo
