On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:57:11 +0100
"P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:42:30 +0800
> Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, P .NIKOLIC
> > wrote:
> > > Since you seem to be in snotty mode that i neither asked for nor
> > > required. if the mirrors were up to date the
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:08:31 +0100
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
>
> > X is not a critical package and you
> > shouldn't mess with udev just because X fails to launch.
>
> Is that right. Many may see X as far more critical. The drivers are in
> the kernel after all.
What drivers? All I was saying is
> X is not a critical package and you
> shouldn't mess with udev just because X fails to launch.
Is that right. Many may see X as far more critical. The drivers are in
the kernel after all.
I presume you mean udev problems could possibly affect bootup. If it
can, maybe that's a design error? Of
On Jun 4, 2012 11:57 AM, "P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:42:30 +0800
> Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, P .NIKOLIC
> > wrote:
> > > Since you seem to be in snotty mode that i neither asked for nor
> > > required. if the mirrors were up to date then this so
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:42:30 +0800
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, P .NIKOLIC
> wrote:
> > Since you seem to be in snotty mode that i neither asked for nor
> > required. if the mirrors were up to date then this sort of thing
> > would not happen , So Needs must , I update
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> Since you seem to be in snotty mode that i neither asked for nor
> required. if the mirrors were up to date then this sort of thing
> would not happen , So Needs must , I update this machine everyday for
> several days i have been told noth
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 07:34:18 +0100
"P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
> > > /usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0:
Oops...i had problem with lvm...but same thing.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
From anger, complete delusion arises, and from delusion
bewilderment of memory. When memory is bewil
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:52:05 +0100
"P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
> Yes i know it is not strictly speaking the correct thing BUT it got
> the system working again what i want to know is which mirror is
> likely to have the fixed version of X on it i can the get back to
> standard system .
I had the same
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:40:48 -0500
Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:52:05 +0100
> "P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
>
> > Hi .
> >
> > I have just run pacman -Suy rebooted the system and found i could
> > not start X getting the error message
> > /usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libra
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:52:05 +0100
"P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
> Hi .
>
> I have just run pacman -Suy rebooted the system and found i could not
> start X getting the error message
> /usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or di
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:52 AM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> Oh i also noitced that the systemd-udev update has messed the PA sound
> system up
FWIW, that probably has the same cause (new version of libudev, but
old version of PA and X).
-t
Hi .
I have just run pacman -Suy rebooted the system and found i could not
start X getting the error message
/usr/bin/X: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory ..
Someone has suggested the fixed version of X but it is n
12 matches
Mail list logo
