On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Anyone (dev or user) for x86_64?
Signoff x86_64
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:33 PM, bender02 wrote:
> On 12/2/09, Arvid Picciani wrote:
>> http://heresy.asgaartech.com/
>>
>> Let me know if this solution works for everyone
>> and/or if anyone is offended by anything on that
>> site or the fact that it ex
On 12/2/09, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> http://heresy.asgaartech.com/
>
> Let me know if this solution works for everyone
> and/or if anyone is offended by anything on that
> site or the fact that it exists
> and/or if anything should be added to it.
Regardless of the fact that I like this in
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Xavier wrote:
> And I am curious to know what the pam settings of other distro are
> (debian,fedora,gentoo,..).
>
> Finally, maybe it makes sense to try keeping all the different pam
> login files as consistent as possible. But I don't know enough about
> pam to te
2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee :
> The *disadvantage* is that the devs/maintainers have to patch up-stream.
> This should be kept to a minimum, primarily to reduce their workload,
> and also because it is ASSUMED that if you use Arch, you're capable of
> doing the Right Thing (tm) according to your situation
Excerpts from kurrata's message of Mi Okt 28 06:03:41 +0100 2009:
> Now when I do "sudo blkid" it shows that both sda1 and sda2 have same UIID.
> Any ideas how could I fix this?
you can change ext2/3/4's uuid by tune2fs.
6 matches
Mail list logo
