Re: [arch-general] usbguard package neglected

On 27.10.20 03:45, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > The point of a signing key is to say "this key certifies the correct > software and I commit to using it. Anything else is automatically > suspect as malware". > > You don't immediately respond by saying "well it came from the same > websit

Re: [arch-general] usbguard package neglected

On 25.06.20 00:37, Levente Polyak via arch-general wrote: > The trust chain is broken as the signing key changed and after multiple > back and forth I still did not get a signed confirmation of the old key > regarding the new maintainers and keys. > > I will try to re ping them with w 5th mail, le

[arch-general] usbguard package neglected

Hello, the package usbguard was flagged out of date in november. Three new versions came out since then. A package update or any info on this would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards

[arch-general] Possible error while refreshing pacman keys

Running either of the commands 'pacman-key --populate archlinux' or 'pacman-key --refresh-keys', outputs 'signature(s) not checked due to a missing key(s)'. Performed a fresh install today with the latest iso and the error stays. Checked and confirmed that all the 6 master keys and their signing

[arch-general] 'gcc' vs 'c++' for compiling c++ files

Compiling a sample xxx.cc file using 'c++' command compiles fine whereas 'gcc' command outputs errors. A whole bunch of 'undefined reference to's. Am i wrong to assume that 'gcc' command would use the file extension and call the appropriate compiler.