On 05/31/13 15:10, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> please signoff syslinux-4.06-2 for the /usr/bin move.
signoff on x86_64
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/09/13 00:09, Damjan wrote:
> same thing after "git clean -fx"
> here's my config if it's relevant
> http://paste.pound-python.org/show/32083/
Using your config on i686 I got the same error. I noticed that you have
set the target processor to Pentium M, and I changed it to generic x86
and it
On 04/08/13 20:37, Damjan wrote:
> On пон, 08 апр 2013 16:35:12 CEST, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 09/04/13 00:25, Damjan wrote:
>>> For various reasons I'm compiling my own kernels, but just now I have
>>> got this error while trying to update and compile 3.8.6.
>>>
>>> gcc is 4.8.0-1
>>> arch is i686
On 03/08/13 18:04, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> dkms can't rebuild deleted vbox modules for the "linux" kernel
>
> # dkms install vboxhost/$(pacman -Q virtualbox|awk {'print $2'}|sed
> 's/\-.\+//') -k $(uname -rm|sed 's/\ /\//')
> Module vboxhost/4.2.8 already installed on kernel 3.7.10-1
On 01/29/13 22:31, Paul Marwick wrote:
> Martín Cigorraga wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Paul Marwick
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've got two machines in my local network that provide NFS shares.
>>> One is
>>> an old Raidsonic NAS (running a current version of OpenWRT), the other a
>>> dedicated
On 01/28/13 03:26, William Giokas wrote:
> pacman-key --refresh-keys
Thanks. problem solved.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t;.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54247#c10
P.S.
Apologies for the off-thread posting, I couldn't find the previous mail
in my mail box.
--
Sudaraka Wijesinghe.
http://sudaraka.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cd wlan0
To disconnect/connect I use poff/pon commands and the scripts are setup
exactly as described on the Wiki.
--
Sudaraka Wijesinghe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/22/12 06:23, Ashim Acharya wrote:
> quiet quite
Aha, yes I did misspell that on command line also. good catch.
And, yes it does quiet down everything.
Problem is that it's too quiet now and even suppressing the possible
error messages. So I don't think this (kernel boot parameter quiet) is
On 11/22/12 05:10, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Sudaraka Wijesinghe
> wrote:
>> On 11/22/12 03:05, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>>> Have you tried adding 'quiet' to the kernel boot line?
>>
>> This doesn't help because the mess
On 11/22/12 03:11, D. Can Celasun wrote:
> Same thing here, though a fast disk prevents it for me.
I wonder if there is some sort of mechanism to make those services load
quietly without them reporting back the [ok] message.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/22/12 03:05, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Have you tried adding 'quiet' to the kernel boot line?
This doesn't help because the messages in question are generated by the
systemd unit loading process, not the Kernel.
Thanks.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
p.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54247, but seems there is
no fix yet.
Can anyone tell me how I might be able to get a clean login prompt?
Thanks.
--
Sudaraka Wijesinghe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/10/12 14:06, jsteel wrote:
> On 10 August 2012 01:55, Sudaraka Wijesinghe
> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I have an external monitor connected to my laptop via HDMI which I use
>> side by side to get an extended desktop.
>>
>> When I boot the system
, and I believe it's not a X problem as
it's not getting any signal even before X starts (It does with 3.4.x).
I was wondering if anyone else has this issue and possibly a solution,
or is this something I need to submit upstream?
Thanks.
--
Sudaraka Wijesinghe
signature.asc
Descr
On 07/18/2012 09:35 PM, Christoph Vigano wrote:
>> No, I'm using initscripts, and it does quiet down when I use the kernel
>> command line parameter as explained in there, but I was wondering how
>> default Arch kernel is doing it without the command line parameter.
>
> It's a patch:
> % grep -R l
On 07/18/2012 08:32 PM, martin kalcher wrote:
> Am 18.07.2012 16:02, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I'm playing with a custom kernel just for the fun of it, Everything
>> works fine except it's very noisy when it boots. I'm using the
g, state changes and file system
mount, etc.
--
Sudaraka Wijesinghe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
flash:w:program-file.hex
(You will need the root privileges for this).
Attached the makefile if it helps you to get an idea.
Sudaraka Wijesinghe
On 07/17/2012 01:43 PM, andrea crotti wrote:
> I'm trying to use my arduino mega2560 with arch but there's no way to
> get it working yet..
&
/class/net/lo:1/carrier: No
such file or directory (x6)
** (x6) means I get 6 of the same message
Can anyone please give me a pointer how to solve this?
Thanks.
--
Sudaraka Wijesinghe
identica/twitter | im/email
On 06/11/12 06:00, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
> El 10/06/12 20:18, John Briggs escribió:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:35:45AM +0800, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
>>> I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work
>>> well,
>>> so I wonder whether it is a bug.
>>> On Jun 11, 2012 4:2
On 06/08/12 08:21, gt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:08:43PM +0530, Sudaraka Wijesinghe wrote:
>> On 06/07/12 19:52, gt wrote:
>>>
>>> I am getting the following error:
>>>
>>> linux-headers-3.3.8-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz: invalid or corrupted package (PG
On 06/07/12 19:52, gt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:51:26AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Am 06.06.2012 17:13, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe:
>>> On 06/06/12 18:31, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> please signoff 3.3.8 series for b
On 06/06/12 18:31, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches.
> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
>
> This will move to [core] directly, because 3.4.1 is in [testing].
>
> greetings
> tpowa
>
Jus
On 06/04/12 23:48, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> Just to add another fedora link:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pjones/Features/SecureBoot
>
> Sounds like they till plan to make use of the UEFI CA $99 signing
> service from Microsoft.
>
>Do you think Arch should follow suit or re
On 05/23/12 16:50, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am 22.05.2012 09:20, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
>> Hi guys,
>> please signoff 3.3.7 series for both arches.
>> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
>> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
>>
>> This will move to [core] directly, becaus
26 matches
Mail list logo
