Re: [arch-general] Groups and GIDs in PKGBUILDs

2012-05-31 Thread Seblu
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > I think it's a bit more complex than that because groups are stored in > archives by their GID, not their name. AFAIK makepkg doesn't call bsdtar with numeric-owner. You can check user/group are also stored in package archive. -- Sébast

Re: [arch-general] drop slim in favor of lightdm

2012-05-08 Thread Seblu
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christian Hesse wrote: > Any thoughts on that? I was interested by your suggestion as slim user since 2 years. Consolekit integration (and my ugly workaround) is my only issue with it. So i took the time to test this light login manager, and my conclusion is : It

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 19.04.2012 01:21, schrieb Seblu: >>> As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if >>> anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. >> >> If you move li

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-18 Thread Seblu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Apr 18, 2012 10:41 AM, "Thomas Bächler" wrote: >> >> Am 08.04.2012 18:08, schrieb Leonid Isaev: >> > Hi, >> > >> >       Cpufrequtils 008 in [core] has long been orphaned and, as you > know, >> > actually deprecated upstream since linux

Re: [arch-general] pacman ignore packages by pattern?

2012-03-19 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 19/03/12 18:43, XeCycle wrote: >> Allan McRae writes: > > allan@mugen ~ >> pacman -Su --ignore libreoffic* > :: Starting full system upgrade... > warning: libreoffice-calc: ignoring package upgrade (3.5.0-2 => 3.5.1-1) > warning: libreoffic

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] ChangeLog usage ..

2012-01-13 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:49:39AM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote: > I'm all for writing useful (and detailed, if necessary) commit messages > instead of writing ChangeLog entries. We use a VCS for some reason. > Using proper commit messages

[arch-general] PyconFR

2011-09-13 Thread Seblu
Hello, Will there be members of archlinux at French Pycon? http://www.pycon.fr/conference/edition2011 Cheers, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] btrfs & Arch

2011-08-22 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote: > Afaics, btrfs will soon get fsck tool for repairing the fs, but I wonder > what's > the plan for btrfs support in Arch, iow, when it can become 'official' ? BTRFS is already supported by initscripts: https://projects.archlinux.org/ini

Re: [arch-general] virtualbox-archlinux-modules depends on kernel26

2011-07-24 Thread Seblu
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Aljosha Papsch wrote: > Hi, > > virtualbox-archlinux-modules still depends on kernel26. I wanted to > copy the package directory from the abs tree, but it's not there. How > is this possible? (Of course I synced it before) More than one package by pkgbuild. look

Re: [arch-general] Creating an Arch chroot on a non-Arch system?

2011-07-23 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > Is there something available out there that makes it easy to create an > Arch chroot on a non-Arch system, e.g. Ubuntu or Fedora? Some times it more easy to create a local chroot with your arch, make a tarball, scp it and untar it. -- Sé

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] dropping tcp_wrapper support

2011-07-16 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Vic Demuzere wrote: > On 16 July 2011 19:22, Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> >> old hosts.allow: >> sshd: 192. >> ntfs: 192. >> >> iptables: >> -A INPUT -j REJECT >> -A INPUT -p tcp -s 192.168.0.0/24 --dport ssh -j ACCEPT >> -A INPUT -p tcp -s 192.168.0.0/24 --dport nfs

Re: [arch-general] Anybody else have problems with the new Nvidia drivers (275.09.07-1)

2011-06-17 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote: > On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote: >> ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory! > > Are we sure ths is a bug with the nVidia driver? Can someone load that image > who isn't using it? > I braved the da

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] netcfg 2.5.5-1

2011-05-27 Thread Seblu
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > On 2011/5/23 Rémy Oudompheng wrote: >> version 2.5.5 >> - new connection types: openvpn (FS#21490), vlan >> - new option HIDDEN (for hidden SSIDs) >> - new option SKIPNOCARRIER (FS#21755) >> - default WPA driver is now nl80211 >> - minor

Re: [arch-general] rc.d bash completion

2011-05-18 Thread Seblu
ooked about right (git wise, haven't looked at the code). I have a patch about rc.d bash completion pending since 5 may... https://github.com/seblu/arch-initscripts/commit/ce18321029e746a0417c65762c6c23b7cfa22185 Tom can you pull my branch? -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg status

2011-05-15 Thread Seblu
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Stan wrote: > Hi guys. > > Wanna know about netcfg package status. In latest git there is very > important variable - HIDDEN, which allows to connect to hidden networks > without PRE_UP="iwconfig " hack. How soon it'll be > in repos? > There is also stuff about vl

Re: [arch-general] /sbin/rc bug?

2011-05-03 Thread Seblu
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:58 PM, D. Can Celasun wrote: > I might have discovered a bug with this new /sbin/rc thing. > > If I run "/etc/rc.d/httpd start", Apache starts just fine. Yet if I do "rc > start httpd" it fails with: > > :: Starting Apache Web > Server > > [BUSY] (13)Permission denied: ma

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Seblu
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> > On 01/05/11 15:35, Johannes Held wrote: >> > >> >> On 01.05.2011 04:13, Ray Kohler wrote: >> >> >> >>> I also have donated i

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-26 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800 > schrieb Oon-Ee Ng : > >> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) >> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem >> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem >> > E

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-26 Thread Seblu
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano > pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in > testing. Issue is still present today. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23919 Kind regards, -- Séb

Re: [arch-general] Touchpad not recognized

2011-04-22 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Hugo Yamashita wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Seblu wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Xianwen Chen >> wrote: > > I know you'll all hate me for saying this, but usually Ubuntu finds every > driver you might ne

Re: [arch-general] Touchpad not recognized

2011-04-22 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Xianwen Chen wrote: > Hey Hugo, > > Thanks a lot! I tried it and and tried to log out and log in again, but > "xinput list" doesn't change its output. :( > > Xianwen > > On 04/18/2011 07:37 PM, Hugo Yamashita wrote: >> >> Have you tried "modprobe psmouse"? >> Works

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev-167-1

2011-04-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys. > udev 167 > > Bugfixes. > > The udev runtime data moved from /dev/.udev/ to /run/udev/. The > /run mountpoint is supposed to be a tmpfs mounted during early boot, > available and writable to for all tools at any time du

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev-167-1

2011-04-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys. > udev 167 > > Bugfixes. > > The udev runtime data moved from /dev/.udev/ to /run/udev/. The > /run mountpoint is supposed to be a tmpfs mounted during early boot, > available and writable to for all tools at any time du

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-03-31 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Features included: > - latest stable patches > - disabled /dev/kmem > - added AMD_IOMMU support > - kernel image

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-26 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Seblu wrote: >>> # Run helper every time a Bluetooth device appears >>> # On remove actions, bluetoothd should go away by itself >>> ACTION=="add|change", SUBSYSTEM==

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-23 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Seblu wrote: > Could you try replacing your bluetooth rules with: > > # Run helper every time a Bluetooth device appears > # On remove actions, bluetoothd should go away by itself > A

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-22 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Seblu wrote: >> So, this situation is a bit confusing, so why do not remove >> /lib/udev/rules.d/97-bluetooth.rules? > > I don't think it is a good idea to remove these rules, a

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-22 Thread Seblu
2011/3/22 Ng Oon-Ee : > Any particular reason you cross-posted this between aur-general and > arch-general? I got screwed by the auto-completion > > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 03:59 +0100, Seblu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> It was a few things I could not explain with bluez

[arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-21 Thread Seblu
Hello, It was a few things I could not explain with bluez and udev. When my system start killswitch off and i toggle killswitch after, bluetoothd is auto started. When my system starts with killswitch on, bluetoothd is not started. (a bit confusing) After adding hooks in rc, bluetoothd refuse to

Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]

2011-02-15 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again > for all his hard work. > > But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, > therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved to > [uns

Re: [arch-general] [testing] protocol - {WAS: [arch-dev-public] WARNING - glibc-2.13-2}

2011-02-07 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 07/02/11 20:26, Seblu wrote: >> >> 2011/2/6 Allan McRae: >>> >>> On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >>&

Re: [arch-general] [testing] protocol - {WAS: [arch-dev-public] WARNING - glibc-2.13-2}

2011-02-07 Thread Seblu
2011/2/6 Allan McRae : > On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >>> >>> I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix is committed to >>> upstream git.  All users should downgrade to the version in [core]. >>> >>> Allan >> >> While I un

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2011-01-31 11:42:56 +0100] Seblu: >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Seblu wrote: >> > Got it. The only difference is the line added in slim.pam? Because i >> > made some test by manually adding this lin

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Seblu wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: >> [2011-01-31 09:50:35 +0100] Seblu: >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: >>> > If you run i686, please let me know if t

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2011-01-31 09:50:35 +0100] Seblu: >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: >> > If you run i686, please let me know if this package solves your issues: >> > >> >        http://a

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2011-01-31 08:40:37 +0100] Seblu: >> Hello, I dug up this old thread to know if someone find a suitable >> solution to use slim (or startx) + window manager working correctly >> with consolekit > 0.4.1 ? > >

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-30 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 11/21/2010 04:55 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > >> Recent display managers (gdm, kdm and lxdm) can handle their own >> polkit/consolekit session through pam access. The gnome/xfce4-session >> packages only have basic access to consolekit and sinc

Re: [arch-general] Linux / mkinitcpio / vbox bug: bad swap file entry

2011-01-03 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > any advice? You can try to run on phy host / kvm host / xen host be sure it's not a vbox / vm related issue. -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > It work perfectly for me on awesome with gnome-volume-control-applet. Thanks! -- Sébastien Luttr