Re: [arch-general] systemd native files in etc

2012-08-23 Thread Qadri
>> if arch would provide you with defaults every time the defaults get >> updated >> you would get *.pacnew files in your etc. since those files are depending >> on >> your system and are user choice it would not be good to provide those. >> >> By that logic, wouldn't I also not get an rc.conf file

[arch-general] systemd native files in etc

2012-08-23 Thread Qadri
Hi all, Given all the hullabaloo about systemd I thought I'd try it out. I went to the wiki and saw that it has listed several "native systemd configuration files" that it looks for, and if they're absent, it takes info from rc.conf. It's "strongly advised" (by the wiki) to use the native files.

[arch-general] Default route not restored (deleted?) after VPN - Juniper Network Connect

2012-02-25 Thread Qadri
Hi all, I've regularly used a VPN to access my school network. I use Juniper ncsvc to connect. It is worked into a script such that I can just call it, and then C-c to stop the VPN. Previously, the default route would be restored after I killed the VPN connection, so I could close the vpn connect

Re: [arch-general] Mouse C&P not working

2012-01-15 Thread Qadri
> Left & right together has no effect here too, I need to push the wheel > button. > > Is this not the true 3-button mouse setup? > From what files is xfce4-mouse-settings getting it's information, resp. > to what files are changes written? Regarding to the buttons the GUI only > displays right h

Re: [arch-general] Mouse C&P not working

2012-01-14 Thread Qadri
> I am used to just grabing with the mouse and pasting straight to the > relevent > place without the un wanted extra steps i believe it need an mouse > section in > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d but cant find any info on creating one any help > please > Did you check out https://wiki.archlinux.org/in

Re: [arch-general] Perl dependencies

2012-01-08 Thread Qadri
> > After having a look at the integrity check source, it looks like it > should deal with provivions already, but that code is obviously broken. > If you could come up with a fix that would be very nice. > > :-/ It does look like it handles it fine. I _was_ going to ask if I could test things out

Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Qadri
> > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) > :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1 > :: valgrind: requires glibc<2.15 > > Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict? > > Thanks, > > Sander > If you're okay wit

[arch-general] Perl dependencies

2012-01-06 Thread Qadri
Below is an excerpt from the integrity check results from arch-dev-public. It seems like most (if not all) of these are provided by perl, though the actual packages are in AUR. What is the appropriate solution (before anyone says the bugtracker, there are already two bugs about this [1] and [2]). I

Re: [arch-general] a plea for python 2

2011-12-14 Thread Qadri
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Evan Martin wrote: > As a software developer, I am now getting contacted by users where my > software doesn't work on Arch. I even applied a patch submitted by an > Arch user to make my code use "python2" only to discover it broke my > software on Mac and Windows

Re: [arch-general] system slowing down when copying files.

2011-08-27 Thread Qadri
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Uli Armbruster < uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > This happens on my machine as well. The reason is, that the kernel swaps > much more with linux 3.0 than 2.6.39. It moves programs into swap to get > more space in ram for cache, which imo is a really stupi

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] New Developer: Dan Griffiths

2010-02-09 Thread Qadri
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Gaurish Sharma >> wrote: >>> Congrats Dan! >>> So what should we expect from you? any special plans? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Gaurish Shar

Re: [arch-general] Making pacman check multiple repos

2009-12-13 Thread Qadri
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Brendan Long wrote: > On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:16 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 17:08 -0700, Brendan Long wrote: > > > 2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee > > > > > > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: > > > > > Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-11-01 Thread Qadri
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Trav wrote: > Are you guys sending nominations or invites? > > I just sent nominations to Cesar G, Rene, Celti, Giovanni. > > Nominations take a few weeks, actual invites (much much more rare) are > instant. > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Cesar G. Miguel > wr

Re: [arch-general] bluetooth pairing with cellphone

2009-08-24 Thread Qadri
I haven't tested this out yet, but I don't see why it shouldn't work. Edit /etc/system.d/bluetooth.conf by adding the following lines before : [code] [/code] Then create the group btuser and add yourself to it. Restart dbus or your computer. You should probably then be able to pair

[arch-general] system-tools-backends

2009-08-10 Thread Muhammad Qadri
I was told that there was some talk some time ago about problems with system-tools-backends on one of the lists, but I wasn't able to find it. I'm looking to try and get those working fully/properly (cause the perl backend's pretty easy to understand...don't ask). I was wondering if people who use

Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Muhammad Qadri
Yes. I believe that is the latest one, since pacman -Syu shows nothing needs updates. Correct? On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2009/8/1, Luís Moreira : > > nvidia > > Are you using nvidia-185.18.31-1? > > > -- > Arch Linux Developer > http://www.archlinux.org > http://w

Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Muhammad Qadri
If "notebook" includes HP Pavilion dv8000 laptop with GEFORCE GO 7600 NVIDIA graphics card (why do they capitalize *everything*?), and you're asking referring to i686, then yes, it seems to be fine, for me. :-) On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Edgar Kalkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I somewhere read some

Re: [arch-general] Xorg broken after last update

2009-08-01 Thread Muhammad Qadri
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Johannes Held wrote: > Luís Moreira : > > Anyone experienced the same thing? > No, work's without any problems here. I have the same setting as you: > x86_64 > without testing. > > -- > Gruß, Johannes > Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut. > Mast u