Re: [arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

2017-03-21 Thread Pierre Neidhardt via arch-general
Many Go tools have fairly generic names. Aren't you afraid of a (possibly future) naming conflicts by placing them all in /usr/bin/? -- Pierre Neidhardt

Re: [arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

2017-03-19 Thread Pierre Neidhardt via arch-general
Sources have to be fetched online at some point anyways. If Internet goes out after you've fetched the sources, then you can still build the packages. Regarding user packages: it is not a good idea to use them in PKGBUILDs for several reasons, first one being that the user is free to change the so

Re: [arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

2017-03-08 Thread Pierre Neidhardt via arch-general
On 17-03-09 00:13:59, Iru Cai via arch-general wrote: > Go programs are compiled to a single binary that do not link > to other go libraries, so they doesn't depend on other go packages. You answered your question here, haven't you? > I'm also confused when I see node.js packages. I see many of t

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Pierre Neidhardt via arch-general
Hi, Same issue here: For the last few weeks I got plenty of e-mails from the Arch MLs sent to spam. Since I've tweaked Gmail's filters it seems to be OK now. On 16-06-08 14:49:14, Syrone Wong via arch-general wrote: > Hi, > > You can add a filter in gmail, set > `list:"arch-general@archlinux.or