On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:16:35PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:00:06 +0200, Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
> > Am 20.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Firmicus:
> >> Yesterday I had bug report on a segfaulting binary for x86_64 that ships
> >> with texlive-bin in testing:
> >> http://bugs.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:28:43PM +0200, Thomas B?chler wrote:
> Am 18.05.2010 16:06, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> > In particular, notice Alex's reply stating:
> >
> > --8<
> > In general, microcode is slowly being moved out of
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 05:23:40PM +0100, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:42:08 +0200, Nezmer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't know If this has been brought up before.
> >
> > The PKGBUILD includes "--optimize=1". So .pyo files are in
Hi,
I don't know If this has been brought up before.
The PKGBUILD includes "--optimize=1". So .pyo files are included in
the package and they conflict with existing ones.
Is there a reason to do this for twisted specifically? Or did I miss a
change in python packaging policies?
> Compile it yourself then (abs is trivial) or if you are too lazy:
> http://vectorlinux.com/ is similar to arch (slightly more slackware biased
> ) and runs on i386
>
Compiling is not fun on old hardware and Vector is not Arch. I agree that
Vector is very
good for old hardware though.
That'
In makechrootpkg, build dirs are chowned to nobody before we move files
to "$uniondir/build". This could lead to failure If the files are
supposed to be dynamically upgraded when we run makepkg.
A common use-case is when we upgrade $pkgver in git,svn PKGBUILDS.
Signed-off-
e upgraded dynamically.
Signed-off-by: Nezmer
---
makechrootpkg |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/makechrootpkg b/makechrootpkg
index 1d2282c..9e36f10 100755
--- a/makechrootpkg
+++ b/makechrootpkg
@@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ if [ -f "ChangeLog" ]; then
cp
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:35:12PM +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
>
> libdrm has been updated to 2.4.17 - this is breaking all radeon 3d
> stuff and will require changes in MESA when I understand the
> upstream devs right. Mesa7.7 is expected in a few days anyways and
> should make Radeon 3d stuff wo
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Rafa Grimán schrieb:
>> Hi :)
>>
>> Got a Lenovo T400 laptop with an Intel 5100 wireless card, lspci:
>>
>> 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN
>> [Shiloh] Network Connection
>>
>> Which was working u
>
>> If Arch wants to be (disk)size-effective, We would end up with hundreds
>> of Debian-like *-{header,dev} packages.
>
> We're not going to do that, it just seemed insane to include this stuff in
> the kernel.
>
>> I just don't think splitting header packages is practical with distributions
>>
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Attila wrote:
> At Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 09:56 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
>
> > Isn't it against Arch philosophy to split packages it binary and header
> > packages?
>
> First the headers from the kernel package was even a reduced amount and if
> you
>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 05:17:56PM -0500, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> 2009/11/26 Samuel Baldwin :
> > Is this going to upgrade every package on my system?
>
> Uh, yeah, is there any other way to do this without installing 410 packages?
>
I know the discussion shifted to the daily preach about the imp
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:35:04 +0200
> schrieb nez...@allurelinux.org:
>
> > That's not a problem. Source redistribution is allowed so we can host
> > the sources wherever we want.
> >
> > I'm interested in a built-from-source native x8
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:23:52 +0100
> schrieb :
>
> > wouldn't it be two PKGBUILDs, for chromium and iron?
>
> I would prefer Iron over Chromium, because it hasn't the Google spyware
> included. Problem with Iron is that the source cod
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:45:13PM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:01 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
> >
> > Just be thankful you are not using ATI hardware where everything prior to
> > the
> > 2400 Series cards were deprecated to "Legacy" cards and all Linux support
> > dropped i
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:16:02PM +0100, David Houston wrote:
> error: replacing packages with -U is not supported yet
> error: you can replace packages manually using -Rd and -U
> error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
> :: nvidia-utils-beta: conflicts with nvidia-utils
I
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:34:40AM +0530, Piyush P Kurur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am part of a group of people who run a mirror for some GNU/Linux
> distros. I have a question regarding how rsync works. The question is
> prompted by the frequent overloading of rsync mirrors.
>
>
> If I am not mistak
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 01:38:15AM +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> * Found an interesting provider: http://openhosting.com/
> which uses KVM and has an interesting pricing scheme.
>
> I hope to get things ready for deployment around December-January.
> Until then I'm close to start with VPSVille
Hi ,
catalyst was removed from the repos for months (now available from the AUR)
but the build files are still in svn trunk :
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/catalyst/trunk/
That causes tools like pbget (which can search for build files in svn
then AUR) to fetch the old broken unsupported
hi ,
What's going on ?
The 2 mirrors I use give 404 error when trying to fetch community db .
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:55:21PM -0300, Denis A. Alto? Falqueto wrote:
> 5. rebuild your copy to make your own package
> 6. uninstall the official nvidia package
> 7. install yours
> 8. cross your fingers... just kidding :)
>
I would suggest uninstalling the official package 1st as It's a kernel
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:06:32PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Attila wrote:
>>
>>> On Mittwoch, 12. August 2009 09:52 Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>>
No, that will not work.
>>> Perhaps in the future? If not, no problem a
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:32:40PM -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 14:16, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > So I have a suspicion that my guess was wrong. You aren't using vi
> > mode in bash, are you?
> >
>
> Nope
In zsh , I have this in ~/.zshrc :
bindkey "\e[1;5C" forward-word
bind
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 17:00 +0300, nez...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > I was looking at the device-mapper PKGBUILD . I'm not sure but the last
> > line looks problematic :
> >
> > # fix device-mapper link bug
> > ln -sf /lib/libdevm
Hi ,
I was looking at the device-mapper PKGBUILD . I'm not sure but the last
line looks problematic :
# fix device-mapper link bug
ln -sf /lib/libdevmapper.so "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/libdevmapper.so" || return 1
What If device-mapper is not yet installed in the system ?
What am I missing ?
not ported yet .
But you can enjoy the new daemon mode .
--
Nezmer
pgp3iHop05mh5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
26 matches
Mail list logo
