> Hi,
> Pacman is acting weird.
> Its asking me to upgrade same set of packages over & over. Even, I have just
> updated said packages.I posted my query on forums[1] but helpful reply. So
> posting it here:
Check /var/lib/pacman/local/, you will probably find many duplicated
entries there. Then
Allan McRae wrote:
>> With every big rebuilds we get new breakage stories. It seems like
>> it's the norm nowadays rather than the exception.
>>
>> I am wondering if it's really only the users that are to blame.. or if
>> Arch is also to blame. Or if Arch was supposed to be an elitist
>> distributi
You should file a bug report at our bug tracker. Packages should only depend
on other from testing if they are in the same repo themself.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11414
--
SZTE Egyetemi Konyvtar - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu
This messag
Idézet Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/6/08, 甘露(Gan Lu) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this a bug or something?
Not sure what you mean, can you give me an example? Are all depends in
there twice? Is it possible it's including both i686 and x86_64
packages?
http://www.archlinux.org/p
Idézés Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 15:55 +0900, Bendany Qian wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I just have a sugguestion about the pkg format.
> >
> > Currently archlinux is using gzip compress method to pack the
> > package, I think it is better to use bzip2. since bzip2 f
> > And I don't hear much complaints about the distro-patching from
> > developers (exceptions: Jörg Schilling for example). A bit going
> > further, I think that "patchability" is one of the main power of
> > open source; and I see nothing wrong (fundamentally) in the common
> > practice, that dis
> Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > An example: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5861
> > This is quite an old bug, and we are just waiting and waiting...
> >
>
> Sometimes packagers are slow, sometimes upstream is slow. This is not
> so surprising, the time of open source deve
> Just a link in case you missed it
> http://phraktured.net/patching-patching-patching.html
> First reply is mine.
OK. I suggested my preferred answer in "foreword", that we shouldn't
answer this question in general, estimate the answer in every
particular case instead.
Some comments: AUR is one
Hi!
I'm new to this list, and my English is far from perfect, please
tolerate it ;-)
I am/was a big fan of ArchLinux, I'm using it from 0.5 version, I also
made some little contributions to pacman, but now I noticed some
tendencies which I cannot accept. So I would like to hear the official
"stan
9 matches
Mail list logo
