hat else I can do to investigate the
problem and find what's a troublemaker here?
p.s. No idea why, but my posts seem to be held for moderation,
I hope this one will make it through.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> Why is it like that?
Because the whole subject has been accumulating emotions for months.
Check this year-old review by Juliusz Chroboczek [1] followed
by Lennart's response [2] and bumped and summarised by (e.g. [3])
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/453004/
[2] http://lwn.net/Articles/453016/
[3]
won't wiggle too much or too often, I'm cool.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
system is heavily inspired by the *BSD way of
incorporating calls from a single file (rc.conf) rather than the SysVinit
directory structure containing dozens of symlinks for each runlevel."
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Linux
--
Mateusz Loskot
(Sent from phone, apology for any top-posting or broken quoting)
ks to Gour, I've just learned about Frugalware which is
sort of Slackware with pacman.
Anyway, I cross my fingers tight for the great minds to keep rc.conf.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 12 July 2012 21:42, rafael ff1 wrote:
> 2012/7/12 Mateusz Loskot :
>>
>> I have been trying to install the AfterShot Pro from AUR packages,
>> full story is here [1]. It uses RPM-packaged i386 binaries.
>>
>> Because I run Arch 64-bit, I'd prefer to ins
html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 9 July 2012 17:28, Ike Devolder wrote:
> Op maandag 9 juli 2012 17:13:47 schreef Mateusz Loskot:
>> On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> >> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin
&g
On 9 July 2012 17:17, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:13:47PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> >> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Ran
On 9 July 2012 17:16, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:06:55AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
>> >
>> > http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=1846
On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> > Tom, All,
>> >
>> > I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've look
On 9 July 2012 17:06, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
>>
>> http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
>
> Why do we have different forum systems with different login requirements
cman -Syuf
But, I'd wait until someone confirms it is the right way to go.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 7 July 2012 20:26, D. Can Celasun wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone know a screenshot taking and snipping application,
>> similar to the Shutter (http://shutter-project.org/), but 'more suckless'.
>> It i
ing to another interesting tool.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 7 July 2012 20:25, Gour wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:18:50 +0100
> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
>> Do you know anything like that?
>
> Doesn't your desktop environment have one?
Nope. I do not use DE. I use i3 window manager.
Anyway, my problem solved with scrot.
On 7 July 2012 20:24, Patrick Burroughs wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know a screenshot taking and snipping application,
>> similar to the Shutter (http://shutter-project.org/), but 'more suckless'
r, without too many edit or sharing features.
IOW, something similar to the Snipping Tool known from Windows Vitsa/7+.
Do you know anything like that?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
ate as a support URL.
https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
nux.org/packages/.../abc/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
u package"
So, I believe it solves the dilemma.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 19 June 2012 22:08, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 Jun 2012 21:05:48 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I'm having weird issue wiht Chromium on the current Arch.
>> Regardless of WM used, Openbox or i3, I can observe it.
>>
>> 0. Fresh Chromium confi
On 16 June 2012 13:37, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> There has been a bug reported to freedesktop.org about problems in xdg-open:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
>
> I can reproduce this bug on my Arch installation (updated daily).
FYI, the problem has been ident
ptions -> Language Settings
3. Now Language Settings tab opens
Has anyone noticed that?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
liar with regarding your plans.
2. If you are not familiar with any particular OS regarding use cases
you are aiming,
then flip a coin with Debian on one side, and Cent OS on the other.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
I wonder if, is there any fix for that problem baked by Arch itself?
BTW, perhaps Arch users could vote for the bug report in freedesktop.org
so its priority is bumped up.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 15 June 2012 20:19, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 15 June 2012 19:49, Karol Babioch wrote:
>>> Am 15.06.2012 20:35, schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
>>>> It doesn't really bother me, but I wonder where the sudde
On 15 June 2012 20:16, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Am 15.06.2012 21:12, schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
>> In my case, nothing "fails".
> You've backgrounded alsa. Could you try to start it in the foreground,
> and see if it still doesn't fail? I would be surprised, to be h
On 15 June 2012 19:49, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Am 15.06.2012 20:35, schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
>> It doesn't really bother me, but I wonder where the sudden change from?
>
> Noticed this also. In my case two pieces of hardware get found and the
> status on the right column
a generic method
It doesn't really bother me, but I wonder where the sudden change from?
$ uname -a
Linux dog 3.4.2-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jun 11 22:27:17 CEST 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 12 June 2012 23:04, David Benfell wrote:
> On 06/12/12 01:40, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> The site: trick [1] has worked for me quite well for long time:
>>
>> "T400 site:http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/";
>>
>> Jeremiah&#x
ing mounted properly.
May be issue with changes regarding using fstab/labels vs UUID.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 12 June 2012 08:05, David Benfell wrote:
> On 06/10/12 11:14, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums
>> traffic is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the
>> lists.
>
> In principle, I prefer ma
ng & filtering ML posts is light-speed fast by simply looking
at subject lines and removing or leaving unread for later.
Plus, I have more control to categorise/label/search ML posts.
(FluxBB search is ineffective.)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> On Jun 11, 2012 1:43 AM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote:
> On 11 June 2012 04:53, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
>> [...]
> I find that If you don't input anything like hitting ENTER at 8th step ,
> everything is OK.
Yes, I can confirm that too.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
read on the forum:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=142848
I followed-up asking for clarification, ideally on the Wiki:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1112328#p1112328
but no responses so far.
IMO, it would be good to have it clarified.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 11 June 2012 09:31, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> wrote:
>> On 06/10/2012 09:14 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>>
>>> Personally, I prefer mailing lists,
>>
>> So do I.
>> Mailing list is, in my VERY
Ubuntu, Fedora work
>>>> well,
>>>> so I wonder whether it is a bug.
>>>> On Jun 11, 2012 4:21 AM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10 June 2012 20:35, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
>>>>> wrote:
>>&g
pens to me with any TTY, not just the one running X.
>>
>
> Same here, I thought everyone had stated it is switching to any TTY from X
> or from some other TTY back to X and this will occur.
Perhaps it's a random random nature of this issue, that makes it occur
for me only when I interact with TTY from which I run xinit.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 10 June 2012 20:35, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
wrote:
> El 10/06/12 14:11, Mateusz Loskot escribió:
>> On 10 June 2012 19:03, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On 10 June 2012 19:40, Kwpolska wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>>> On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm wondering, what amount of Arch
On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
>> use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
>> registered to the Arch Forums?
>
order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 10 June 2012 19:03, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I have been observing strange issues when I switch between X and TTY.
>> [...]
>
> I started noticing this same thing since last year (though don't
> r
ecent version of xf86-video-intel
in the Arch repos [2].
[1] http://infra.in.zekjur.net/archives/i3-discuss/2012-June/000699.html
[2] http://infra.in.zekjur.net/archives/i3-discuss/2012-June/000702.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On 6 June 2012 10:59, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, I apologies if this is not the right place to send this post,
> but I couldn't find how to reach the Flyspray admins.
> [...]
FYI, I also forwarded this post to the "Forum & Wiki discussion":
https
os/mloskot/7159283101/
Could the admins help me to get around this lock?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
47 matches
Mail list logo
