Hi,
The package has been market out of date for quite some time now
(almost 4 months) [0].
One release has now actually been skipped (1.73).
--
Jayesh Badwaik
https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io
[0] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/boost/
Is there a reason why boost libraries are stuck to version 1.72 when
1.74 are already available? I cannot find anything on the bug tracker.
Thank you.
--
Best
Jayesh Badwaik
Thank you.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:09 PM Florian Pritz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:41:54PM +0100, Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general
> wrote:
> > Test Message
>
> If you just want to test if your DMARC verifier works, there are a few
> possibilities listed he
Test Message
--
Best
Jayesh Badwaik
https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Yes, I meant the files inside the package. Thanks for the correction.
I thought there might be a tool like `pacman -Ql`. Turns out, I was missing
the `-p` option there.
Thank you.
--
Jayesh Badwaik
https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hi,
I am trying to write an automated script which takes in packages and package
files created by makepkg and uploads it somewhere.
For this, I would need the list of files created by the `makepkg` command. Is
there a way to get that?
--
Best
Jayesh Badwaik
https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io
si
Hmm, sorry for the noise. You can safely ignore the mail. The problem was
caused by incompatible configuration in other operating systems, not ArchLinux.
--
Cheers
Jayesh Badwaik
https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Fixed the link:
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/sdl2#n50
--
Jayesh Badwaik
https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
As I currently notice here (line 32)
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?
h=packages/sdl2#n31
The SDL2 library is not build with a static component. This is useful for a
lot of development and hence, it would be nice if it is build with static
component. Als
On Sunday, 28 October 2018 21:17:31 CET Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> The wiki has an article about kpatch, but note that you will have to
> maintain your own kernel then. Also kpatch is really geared to updating
> your kernel for security issues and not updating to a newer version. [1]
>
> [1] https
Hi,
I am looking at possibilities to have a setup which does not need to be
restarted at all and can be live patched. I have seen this old post:
http://allanmcrae.com/2015/03/updating-arch-kernel-on-digital-ocean/
And I am reading information about kpatch. But there does not need to be much
in
I finally got around to editing my code, and I realized how bad my
request was. Thank you for suggesting the good alternative. :-)
I've noticed that the include paths for python 3 are updated according
to the version of python being installed. This removes some stability
for custom programs which build against python (example boost.python).
It would be nice if there was a symlink version of python include
paths to a stable loc
13 matches
Mail list logo