On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:11:00 -0500
"P. A. López-Valencia" wrote:
>
> On 17/12/14 16:46, Jacob Joseph wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100
> > Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> >
> >> [2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen:
> >>> 2.0.26 is t
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100
Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen:
> > 2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users,
> > 2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version
>
> Arch is not stable, it's modern.
>
> Besides, there are no open bugs regarding gnupg on our t
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:10:54 +0200
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> > However, the issue is more general, and I'm
> > unsure whether I should continue posting such bugs.
> Systemd will probably remove all this *bad* but convenient hiding.
> I reminds you, this is to have a clean boot when everyth
Hi.
A recurring source of frustration for my use of Arch Linux is
that many init scripts fail to produce any output, to either the
console or syslog, when something goes wrong and the script
fails. The particular cause is always case-dependent (usually
stemming from some config error).
Some unde
4 matches
Mail list logo