Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Migration to systemd

2012-08-14 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On 08/14/2012 12:55 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote: > On 14 August 2012 10:57, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: >> Systemd has a overall better design than SysV, lots of useful administrative >> features and provide quicker boot up. Considering that it has been around in >> our repositories for some time and

Re: [arch-general] Python 3 Rationale?

2010-10-20 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:58:42 -0400 Max Countryman wrote: > That is fine unless the Python development team has decide that > python3 will not become python. > > Python 2.7.x will be maintained for quite some time. (In excess of > four more years.) Even after it is dropped in the future there's

Re: [arch-general] Python 3 Rationale?

2010-10-20 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 04:31:17 + (UTC) Mithrandir wrote: > Max Countryman me.com> writes: > > > > > > I failed to find a reference, but I seem to remember the Python > > > team > deciding at some point that they > > intended to keep the name "python" for the Python 2.X binaries > > perpetual

Re: [arch-general] gnome-terminal configuration

2010-07-08 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:47:03 -0400 wrote: > > greetings, > I noticed the other day that some of the settings I configured in my > ~/.bash_profile aren't implimented when using the gnome-termianl. > For the most-part, it's not too big a deal; some of it just aliases > system admin stuff that I do

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-24 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:25:54 -0500 ProfessorTomoe wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:08 +0200, Attila wrote: > > > > Is there a way to disable the symbolic link creation? I install > > > aur packages using makepkg -ci, but the -ci switch combo does not > > > delete the symlink. I don't want the

Re: [arch-general] Any Arch Users/Developers @ Linuxtag 2010?

2010-06-07 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:16:51 -0300 Felipe Tanus wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Rafael Correia > wrote: > > The purpose of Microsoft at a Open Source event? Steal code, of > > course. > > > > -- Rafael Correia > > > >Actually, Microsoft contributes to open source [1

Re: [arch-general] Converting to 64

2010-05-28 Thread Hilton Medeiros
have to download > 64bits packages. > > Still you can keep the list of installed packages with $(pacman -Qq) > and keep some conf files before erasing the 32bit root partition. > > On 28 May 2010 15:50, Hilton Medeiros > wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:

Re: [arch-general] Converting to 64

2010-05-28 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:28:55 -0500 "Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr." wrote: > you have to reinstall > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I recently found that my processor is capable of running 64bit OS > > (it has the lm flag in /proc/cpuinfo) and I am usi

Re: [arch-general] Google Chrome

2010-05-28 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Fri, 28 May 2010 15:05:50 +0530 Madhurya Kakati wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Ionut Biru > wrote: > > On 05/28/2010 12:14 PM, Madhurya Kakati wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> Now that Google Chrome is not beta any more and chromium hasn't > >> been updated in the repos yet i think i shou

Re: [arch-general] The libgmp update

2010-03-27 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 09:21:51 +1000 Allan McRae wrote: > On 28/03/10 08:19, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > Am Samstag, 27. März 2010 23:08:08 schrieb Hilton Medeiros: > >> Hello, > >> > >> just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp > >&

[arch-general] The libgmp update

2010-03-27 Thread Hilton Medeiros
Hello, just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp should follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gmp>=5.0', right? I just saw that gnunet didn't. Cheers, Hilton