2017-08-15 21:10 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz :
> Oddly enough, I use Thunderbird, which displays HTML mail fine, and
> viewing the message source tells me that message was formatted as
> (mangled) plaintext.
The one I sent first, from my phone, clearly has the header for
"multipart/alternative" and then
2017-08-15 15:32 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz :
> I have no patience for reading people's broken quoting. Please try
> again, this time using a decent email client.
>
The Gmail Android app sends HTML emails - which I forgot when replying
during my lunch break - and I'm sorry for that, but it's not someth
Den 15 aug. 2017 13:46 skrev "Eli Schwartz" :
On 08/15/2017 03:47 AM, Paul Gideon Dann via arch-general wrote:
> Yes, partial upgrades are unsupported, but in practice this still happens,
> usually not deliberately. For instance, I will quite often do a "pacman -S
> " without doing a full system u
Den 1 aug. 2017 06:29 skrev "Grady Martin via arch-general" <
arch-general@archlinux.org>:
On 2017年07月31日 17時07分, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> I'm not sure what you want to achieve by posting this to arch-general,
> this issue really does not concern Arch Linux and I would argue it is out
> off sco
2017-07-24 9:36 GMT+02:00 Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general
:
> All fine and good but I don't see arch being installed on something
> other than desktop/laptop. Of course there are niche cases as arch
> server I do not doubt but how much of arch install base is traditional
> desktop? I think it's rat
2017-03-06 15:01 GMT+01:00 Ralf Mardorf :
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:45:37 +0100, Henrik Danielsson wrote:
>>We could simply deny the AUR username request it for the same reason,
>>or no reason at all. Since some people seem uncomfortable about what
>>could be derived from a pot
2017-03-06 14:36 GMT+01:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general
:
> On 06-03-2017 12:45, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general wrote:
>> 2017-03-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general <
>> arch-general@archlinux.org>:
>>
>>> On 06-03-2017 11:20, Henrik Danielss
2017-03-06 12:58 GMT+01:00 Martin Kühne via arch-general
:
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general
> wrote:
> > I was not replying to anyone in particular. Gaetan? Sorry, you lost me
> > there.
>
> It may not have appeared in the same thr
2017-03-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org>:
> On 06-03-2017 11:20, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general wrote:
> > 2017-03-06 11:18 GMT+01:00 Ralf Mardorf :
> >>
> >> Privacy is a principle. You seem not to understand t
2017-03-06 11:39 GMT+01:00 Martin Kühne via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org>:
>
> Gaetan's criticism applies to you here, now. please designate
> paragraphs of text which you reply to.
>
I was not replying to anyone in particular. Gaetan? Sorry, you lost me
there.
2017-03-06 11:18 GMT+01:00 Ralf Mardorf :
>
> Privacy is a principle. You seem not to understand the difference
> between giving somebody data with the formal permission to use this data
> and data that simply is available for everybody, but not explicitly
> handed over to somebody. Paranoia isn't
I guess I'll be the devil's advocate. I see no privacy issues in handing
over a list of already public information You could deny it for practical
reasons though, if you simply could not be bothered to scrape/export such a
list yourself. Denying or allowing won't stop anyone from obtaining the
list
2016-06-08 6:26 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org>:
>
>
> dkim header remarks indicate either failed or missing dkim sigs for
> those messages.
>
> Is anyone else seeing this behavior change?
>
I didn't look very long but i could only find one message from this li
>
>
> > when the (in MHO excellent) choice to package systemd by default has
> > already been made and it works perfectly well?
> I never said systemd shouldn't be packaged by default!
Apologies, poor wording on my part. That wasn't meant to imply you ever
did. I understood you wanted an alter
>
> It's ok now not because of the wiki and the AUR, but thanks to the
> existence of systemd-free.org. It had to be created because of the
> above, which would'nt have happened with a better community.
So far I've not seen anyone in this thread, or in the replies by Poettering
referenced by syste
I think I'll stick my head out and say Enlightenment.
Looks good enough, works well enough, mature/old enough, both stable and
flexible enough [for me], and it's keeping up with Wayland support.
2015-07-03 6:45 GMT+02:00 Yaro Kasear :
>
> I wouldn't mind some spiritual successor to systemd where its entire
> purpose is to be init, without sacrificing some of the more useful/powerful
> features like cgroups, concurrency, and the like. Systemd went wrong when
> it started going into stuff th
2015-05-15 18:46 GMT+02:00 Ralf Mardorf :
> The folder's permission for the group has to be r-x.
>
> This is because x on directories is required to search their contents.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/File_permissions_and_attributes#Folders
http://askubuntu.com/questions/83788/accessing-f
There are lots of trailing whitespaces on those lines (looking at the raw
email).
Retry with "diff -w" to ignore whitespace diffs.
2015-03-22 14:47 GMT+01:00 Martti Kühne :
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > for some time past I often need to replace diff wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
