to diagnose this? I don't think systemd-analyze
>can handle
>shutdown. Could this be an initrd thing?
>
>Paul
I see the same thing on my box.
The system shuts down, I get a message to that effect printed, yet the hardware
keeps running for more than 3m. Eventually, I always cold-shutdown the computer
when it reaches that state.
Any ideas why this is?
Gesh
On March 27, 2014 11:20:04 AM GMT+02:00, "Thomas Bächler"
wrote:
>Am 27.03.2014 09:41, schrieb Gesh:
>> Basically, if I understood what happens correctly, the units under
>/etc/systemd/system/*.wants/ - or their targets, if they're symlinks -
>replace their corresp
On March 27, 2014 9:25:24 AM GMT+02:00, "Thomas Bächler"
wrote:
>Am 26.03.2014 23:13, schrieb Gesh:
>> Thanks for the pointers.
>> If I understand what's going on correctly, units specify in their
>[Install] section whether, when they're enabled, th
but haven't been yet.
And systemctl enable/disable manages the symlinks under /etc/systems/system
specified by the [Install] section.
Is my understanding of the situation correct?
Thanks,
Gesh
to be enabled at boot? This would both simplify
backups and reduce the magic of and dependence on systemctl.
Is there any reason this can't or shouldn't be done?
With best regards,
Gesh
[1] - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/43459
= tde-tdebase
>>>
>>> I think the change needed is:
>>>
>>> replaces = tde-tdebase
>>> replaces = trinity-tdebase
>>> provides = tdebase
>>> provides = tde-tdebase
>>>
>>> Does this have a chance of working or should I just bite the
>bullet and
>>> rebuild the package?
>>>
>>> --
>>> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>
>Try https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1285524
A naïve reading of [1] suggests that makepkg -R should do the trick.
However, as I'm away from my computer, I can't test
this.
Gesh
[1] - https://www.archlinux.org/pacman/makepkg.8.html
ystem clean, for easing the lives of systems
administrators everywhere by keeping out of their way, and for teaching
newbies how Linux works by leaving its guts visible.
May you retroactively have had a happy solstice,
Gesh
Also, this move was publicized in the forums, IRC topic, mailing list and
front-page news.
Seriously, if you're updating a months-old system, you'd better go over the
front-page news, at the very least.
Gesh
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15,
I'm interested in attending. Worst-case scenario, I will only get a
refresher.
Best-case scenario, I'll discover I'm an idiot and that there are things
I'm doing wrong.
Should be fun.
See you next week, then!
Gesh
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:14 AM, William Giokas <1007...@g
9 matches
Mail list logo
