On 1 April 2016 at 11:21, Tinu Weber wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:03:33 +0200, Garmine 42 wrote:
>> I have this file:
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17 Mar 23 02:05 /etc/sysctl.d/10-sysrq.conf
>>
>> With this content:
>> kernel.sysrq = 1
>>
>>
Hi!
I believe it's a layer 8 error, but I can not change kernel.sysrq at
boot to anything else than defined by Arch packages. I read the
manpage, wiki and google a few times yet I can't spot my mistake.
I have this file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17 Mar 23 02:05 /etc/sysctl.d/10-sysrq.conf
With thi
(You might want to change your password. :) )
On 25 March 2016 at 03:45, Anna Ivanova wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:
> Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:44 AM
> Subject: Welcome to the "arch-general" mailing list
> To: kalte...@gmail.com
>
>
> Welcome to the arch-general@arc
2:12 AM, Grady Martin
> wrote:
>
>> On 2016年02月17日 00時06分, Garmine 42 wrote:
>>
>>> It was indeed a font issue, the one I used did not contain the braille
>>> characters. Because the same problem existed on my gettys I thought it
>>> was an encoding issue or
On 22 February 2016 at 18:41, Jameson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM Garmine 42 wrote:
>
>> On 22 February 2016 at 17:22, Jameson wrote:
>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 6:36 AM Guus Snijders
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
On 22 February 2016 at 17:22, Jameson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 6:36 AM Guus Snijders wrote:
>
>> Op 20 feb. 2016 16:06 schreef "Jameson Pugh" :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Alistair Grant
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 20 February 2016 at 02:38, Jameson Pugh wrote:
>>
On 16 February 2016 at 22:46, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Garmine 42 on Tue, 2016/02/16 18:33:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Since the update to 2.0 the usage graphs use nonexisting fonts - both
>> TTY and uxterm show the "empty box" unicode character instead of the
>> f
Hi!
Since the update to 2.0 the usage graphs use nonexisting fonts - both
TTY and uxterm show the "empty box" unicode character instead of the
fonts shown on htop 2.0 screenshots.
I did not find any missing dependency for htop on my system.
Do anyone else have this issue?
Any ideas? Shall I ins
original mkinitcpio ramdisk because /etc/fstab is not on
the root volume.
Regards,
Garmine
On 20 January 2016 at 21:58, ProgAndy wrote:
> Am 20.01.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Garmine 42:
>>
>> First I will try to exclude root= and rootflags= parameters from the
>> cmdline and inclu
(Yes, I use grub2.) Actually, grub-mkconfig is just a bunch of
scripts, I should be able to grep and cut fstab and generate rootflags
from that, shouldn't I? :)
Is the cmdline size still limited to 255 characters?
On 20 January 2016 at 21:48, Garmine 42 wrote:
> I would like to avoid m
tty sure masking the
> remount service will ensure that your root remains mounted ro...
>
> Devon
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Garmine 42 wrote:
>> On 20 January 2016 at 21:18, Leonid Isaev
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:01:22PM +0100, Garmine 42
On 20 January 2016 at 21:18, Leonid Isaev
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:01:22PM +0100, Garmine 42 wrote:
>> There was a discussion on the linux-btrfs mailing list about this, and
>> for example the btrfs space_cache option can not be changed with a
>> remount - this ca
P.s.: link to the mailing list thread about the mentioned discussion:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/52312
On 20 January 2016 at 21:01, Garmine 42 wrote:
> There was a discussion on the linux-btrfs mailing list about this, and
> for example the btrfs space_cache
>
> The systemd remount service remounts your root file system according
> to what is listed in fstab. This includes mounting root with the mount
> options listed therein.
>
> If you need something else, what exactly are you trying to do?
>
> Devon
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 a
Hi!
My concern is that there are a few mount flags which can not be
changed with a remount (at least on some FSes such as btrfs).
Now as far as I understand, the kernel mounts root RO after boot using
the root and rootflags parameters. I also found that you can include
/etc/fstab in the initrd. H
Hi,
Arch runs the vanilla kernel with a few patches (literally something like
3), so if it is really fixed in vanilla it is fixed in Arch.
Regards,
Garmine
2016. jan. 14. du. 8:20 ezt írta ("Andrew Martin" ):
> Hello,
>
> I installed Arch on an EVO 850 120GB SSD. I read about the linux EVO
> 800
16 matches
Mail list logo
