On 20 April 2017 at 16:21:21, Eli Schwartz via
arch-general wrote:
> Actually, Allan said he dislikes that concept
entirely and refuses to
> merge it at all because:
> 1) CFLAGS+="-flto" should be set in
makepkg.conf, not libmakepkg
> 2) PGO will not be a thing because "I am not
adding an option
> On 20 April 2017 at 14:07:54, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi, are you in a hurry?
Not at all. But I can imagine what feels someone
who made effort to make things better by writing
patches which are still ignored year after.
> IMO it's unhealthy to be in a hurry, apart from
this seemingly not everybo
> On 20 April 2017 at 03:23:04, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I would be concerned, if too many security
features not everybody needs,
> would become default. Why not dropping security
features completely and
> instead making real-time optimised features the
default? This is a
> rhetorical question, but ac
- Reply to message -
Subject: Re: [arch-general] user namespaces
Date: 2 February 2017 at 18:22:36
From: "Daniel Micay"
To: "General Discussion about Arch Linux"
:
> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 17:06 +0200, Francisco
Barbee via arch-general
> wrote:
>> So what&
So what's your alternatives/setup usable on Arch
(not android, not ChromeOS)? We heave disabled
SElinux, disabled Apparmor, disabled user
namespaces, PIE not enabled by default and only
partial relro. What's left then? Swimming naked?
5 matches
Mail list logo
