On 26.08.2010 11:15, goodme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I found the texlive-x-doc packages vanished, 32/64 bit are all
vanished.
anyone are kind enough to tell me the reason?
I suppose the reason is that the packages were outdated and no longer in sync with the
corresponding texliv
On 03/08/2010 13:20, Mathias Huber wrote:
Hi,
for those who wanted to be alerted: My short writeup on Arch Linux for
Linux-Magazin (German Edition) is freely available online:
http://www.linux-magazin.de/Heft-Abo/Ausgaben/2010/09/Frische-Ware
Best Regards,
Mathias
I have indeed just receiv
On 31/07/2010 14:00, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 13:30, schrieb jesse jaara:
The name and description of the arch-dev-public mailing list are
extreamly misleading, for me personally the name and description tells that
the list is open for everyone to discuss about development of Arch L
On 14/05/2010 21:09, Xavier Chantry wrote:
Just in case people think this is a theoretical problem no one cares about ...
solving this would give us tar.xz support that comes with latest
version of gzip plugin :
http://code.google.com/p/vim/source/browse/runtime/plugin/gzip.vim
Never opened a pac
On 12/05/2010 07:17, Caleb Cushing wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Firmicus wrote:
Certainly this is because glib-perl needs to be recompiled with perl 5.12.
Other perl packages that include binary libraries may need to be recompiled
too. We need a TODO list for such perl packages
On 11/05/2010 20:00, Guillaume Brunerie wrote:
Hi,
Since the update of perl 5.10 to 5.12 yesterday, checkgmail (from community)
doesn’t work anymore, it fails with this error :
/usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Glib/Glib.so: undefined symbol:
Perl_sv_utf8_upg
On 29/04/2010 04:25, Caleb Cushing wrote:
Is there a timeline for perl 5.12 entering testing? I realize it's an
important not to be jumped into thing... but I don't see any bugs that
are obviously holding it up... so I'm just curious why it hasn't
entered testing yet.
See my reply to aur-ge
On 13/04/2010 22:30, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 04/12/2010 04:46 PM, Firmicus wrote:
On 12/04/2010 02:04, Alexander Lam wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
Guys,
For some reason, emerald has started crashing when changing
themes in
On 12/04/2010 02:04, Alexander Lam wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
Guys,
For some reason, emerald has started crashing when changing themes in
Gnome. It
changes the theme just fine, but then crashes. (disappears - no error shown or
in any logs). The
On 26/03/2010 00:07, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
Repository : extra
Name : gsfonts
Version: 1.0.7pre44-1
Installed : 8.11-5
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on
Eric Bélanger a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Firmicus wrote:
>
>> Eric Bélanger a écrit :
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Allan McRae a écrit :
>>>>
>&
Eric Bélanger a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote:
>
>> Allan McRae a écrit :
>>
>>> Firmicus wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;)
>&
Allan McRae a écrit :
> Firmicus wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;)
>>
>> I recently got this bug report:
>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690
>>
>> It turned out it was not a bug with the perl pac
Hi folks,
Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;)
I recently got this bug report:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690
It turned out it was not a bug with the perl package at all, but a
problem which occurs when the presumably very old and no longer existing
package "termcap-compat" is ins
Andrea Scarpino a écrit :
> On 14/10/2009, dick_turpin wrote:
>
>> Yes perl-test-pod is giving me grief, its not there so pacman -Syu fails
>>
> This is another issue, already known (FS#16635)
>
>
and fixed
Ashish SHUKLA a écrit :
> In <4acdada2.7030...@gmx.net>, Firmicus wrote:
>> Ashish SHUKLA a écrit :
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I've noticed that the recent perl update (5.10.1-3) has not
>>> installed any PODs
>>> which are requi
Armando M. Baratti a écrit :
> Xavier wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Bächler
>> wrote:
>>> Xavier schrieb:
Unfortunately we can no longer check the cvs repo afaik.
We cannot see earlier than April 2008 :
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/PKGBUILD?vie
Firmicus a écrit :
> Thomas Bächler a écrit :
>
>> Firmicus schrieb:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
>>> I noticed the error message:
>>> /etc/rc.sysinit
Thomas Bächler a écrit :
> Firmicus schrieb:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
>> I noticed the error message:
>> /etc/rc.sysinit: line 364: /dev/tty[0-9]*: no such file or directory
>> To my s
Hi folks,
My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
I noticed the error message:
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 364: /dev/tty[0-9]*: no such file or directory
To my surprise, only /dev/tty was present, but none of tty0..9. Instead
there was a device literally named '/dev
Giovanni Scafora a écrit :
> 2009/10/8, Firmicus :
>
>> See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16488
>>
>> But please, "broken" is too strong! Perl is not broken. It's just that
>> because of the purge options in makepkg.conf, all pods have been
&g
Ashish SHUKLA a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've noticed that the recent perl update (5.10.1-3) has not installed any PODs
> which are required by 'perldoc' for displaying documentation. Are PODs moved
> to some different package ?
>
> #v+
> % pacman -Ql perl |fgrep .pod
> % pacman -Q perl
> perl 5.
Stefan Husmann a écrit :
> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Firmicus wrote:
>>> I don't know about the texlive-*-doc packages from community, which are
>>> maintained by Stefan Hussman. Feel free to ask him directly or to
>>> fi
Aaron Griffin a écrit :
> 2009/10/5 Sergej Pupykin :
>
>> Btw, if someone interested in, here is the list of packages which failed
>> last time:
>>
>> texlive-bibtexextra
>> texlive-bibtexextra-doc
>> texlive-core
>> texlive-core-doc
>> texlive-fontsextra-doc
>> texlive-formatsextra-doc
>>
Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
> Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 19:21:54 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>
>> I believe
>>
>
> +1 for a "use only lower case in pkgname" policy
>
>
This policy has always been there, no?
Besides:
1. This is something that "namcap PKGBUILD" would have picked up.
2. In vim
Juan Diego a écrit :
> I have the same problem here
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Firmicus wrote:
>
>> Piyush P Kurur a écrit :
>>
>>> I am having problems with the texlive package. I tried to install
>>> the package texlive-most and here is
Piyush P Kurur a écrit :
> I am having problems with the texlive package. I tried to install
> the package texlive-most and here is the error that pacman throws
>
> /usr/share/texmf-dist/bibtex/bib/amsrefs/amsj.bib exists in both
> 'texlive-core' and 'texlive-bibtexextra'
> /usr/share/texmf-dist/b
Sergej Pupykin a écrit :
> >> I would say, use /usr/share/www/ (or similar) for static/php files,
> and provide proper configuration
> >> files that set the correct Alias and Directory directives for
> popular servers like apache and
> >> lighttpd. Users can then use Include directives (in case o
Roman Kyrylych a écrit :
> 2009/10/2 Sergej Pupykin :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to discuss using /srv directory in packages
>>
>> (For reference: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16410)
>>
>> Of course I can easy sed and rebuild all my web packages, but I want to know
>> reason why we disable /srv in
Nicolas Bigaouette a écrit :
> See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16420 and
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16422
>
Both fixed.
F
> 2009/10/1 Firmicus
>
>
>> A Rojas a écrit :
>>
>>> David C. Rankin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
A Rojas a écrit :
> David C. Rankin wrote:
>
>
>> List,
>>
>> The new texlive packages seem to have an error in them. The following
>> errors occurred during the upgrade:
>>
>>
>
> And also:
>
> $> LC_ALL=C sudo pacman -S texlive-latexextra
> resolving dependencies...
> looking for inter-c
David C. Rankin a écrit :
> List,
>
> The new texlive packages seem to have an error in them. The following
> errors occurred during the upgrade:
>
texlive: updating the fontmap files with updmap...
>
> !!! ERROR! The map file `ams-bsr-interpolated.map' has not been fou
Dan McGee a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Aaron Griffin
> wrote:
>
>> So in the next few weeks, I would like to buy a netbook. The market is
>> saturated, so I'd like to ask for some advice here.
>>
>> What do you guys think of the current offerings? What's considered
>> "the bes
Evangelos Foutras a écrit :
> Eric Bélanger wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Evangelos Foutras
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
I pushed all of your patches. The last one didn't apply cleanly, s
Thomas Göbel a écrit :
> Hi,
> the package poppler is a missing dependency of texlive-bin.
>
This has been reported already: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16032
(the fixed package has been released earlier today).
F
>> yeap, my bad. I'll fix this. sorry.
>> note that libpoppler should be a dep of "texlive-bin", not "latex".
>>
>
>
> Thanks. Are you the maintainer of this package ? Should I file a
> bug report ?
>
>
Yes I am. Please do!
F
Jan Spakula a écrit :
> Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
>
>> complaint was that they are not in the correct format. So I guess
>> the following needs to be done.
>>
>> 1) Add libpoppler as a dependency to latex
>>
>
> you are right about this.
>
> RedFlag (where the heck did this come from??)
>
Hum! Ever heard of China? ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Flag_Linux
http://www.redflag-linux.com/en/about.php
Henri Häkkinen a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I have some problems with installing LaTeX. Here is the output of `pacman -S
> texlive-core`:
>
> :: Retrieving packages from extra...
> t1lib-5.1.2-2-i686 838.9K 87.9K/s 00:00:10 [#]
> 100%
> gd-2.0.35-1 175.9K 52.8
Geoffroy Carrier a écrit :
- Mr Muscle or "Bucheron" ("woodcutter" in French)
Ah non! ce surnom est réservé aux Canadiens!
(Eh no! This nickname is for Canadians only!)
If you still insist on using my name, it's something like Geoffrey, by
removing the "d" sound from the initial "dj" and rep
Aaron Griffin a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:10 +0300, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
you are
knowing the lack of resources, why you don't proposed to move your
pkgs which have a small use to unsupported (i think 20% of
w9ya a écrit :
And what you have done below is called taking/quoting something out of
context to change it's meaning.
i.e. The important things to remember is that the TU's make up the
rules AND that the voting system was put in place after assurances
that it would NEVER be used to make decis
Gour a écrit :
"Anton" == Anton Achatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anton> Hello, after the latest system update arch changes tetex with
Anton> texlive. now i have the problem to use some programs which needs
Anton> tetex as dependency like muttprint or dblatex. Is there a
Anton> op
43 matches
Mail list logo
