Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.

2011-04-10 Thread DrCR
Dennis, If you like Gnome2 that much, fix your self up with a nix install with Gnome2 and just don't update for the next few years. No, I'm not kidding. No one is forcing you to upgrade. Complaining about WMs amazes me as they're so may you can choose from. There's so many distros to choose from f

Re: [arch-general] base stuff (was: Change Arch's default crond)

2011-04-06 Thread DrCR
Could you guys elaborate on why you dislike selinux. I would appreciate it. Do you prefer AppArmor, or do you dislike that as well? On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> As for adding SELinux support in base but keeping it turned off by default, >> +1 > > Although this isn

Re: [arch-general] Wohoo Compiz Install was a Breeze!

2009-04-28 Thread DrCR
Awesome, to see you're up an running. Didn't you have an Error11 when attempting to start X? Maybe that's my imagination. If not, how did you fix it? I'm currently having this problem myself. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: >> Listmates, >> > >>

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-26 Thread DrCR
"I can look at the license and then see what authority exists to either substantiate the concerns or provide the information showing that the concern is unjustified." Nah, not lawyer speak. Just educated english speak. ;p On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > David C. Rankin wrot

[arch-general] Fresh Install: Signal 11 error when attempting to start X

2009-04-19 Thread DrCR
Just recently did a fresh ftp install of Arch. Getting a Signal 11 error when attempting to start Arch. I tried to follow the wikis fairly closely when setting things up. Any insight? I made sure to to do a system update before posting. Thanks, DrCR

[arch-general] Fresh Install: Signal 11 error when attempting to start X

2009-04-19 Thread DrCR
Just recently did a fresh ftp install of Arch. Getting a Signal 11 error when attempting to start Arch. I tried to follow the wikis well in setting things up. Any insight? Xorg.0.log below. Thanks, DrCR __ X.Org X Server 1.6.1 Release Date: 2009-4-14 X Protocol Version 11

Re: [arch-general] [Fwd: [arch-announce] Dropping i686 support]

2009-04-01 Thread DrCR
So are these last few posts code for the deal with AMD falling through? Bummer. Did we get a counter offer from Intel? Perhaps a switch to x86-only could be in order... On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Denis A. AltoƩ Falqueto wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Johannes Held wrote: >> Denis

Re: [arch-general] [Fwd: [arch-announce] Dropping i686 support]

2009-03-31 Thread DrCR
Guys ... this is no joke. I'm just glad there are other distros out there (and superior ones really, like Mandrake) that still support x86. I wouldn't be surprised if AMD money is behind this, now that they are losing their x86 license from Intel. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Thomas Bohn wrot