Re: [arch-general] linux-3.14.3-1 and FAT32 /boot partition mount fail

ally built did not recognize vfat or xfs, but did recognize btrfs, and that was true for the fallback image as well. regards, -- David Moore Senior Software Engineer St. James Software Email: dav...@sjsoft.com

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Bächler wrote: [snip] > >> Simple as in a technical standpoint, says that it should be mounted in >> fstab. Why? Because fstab is the place were filesystems that should be >> mounted on boot go. The damn thing is *made* for it. > > I already d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Bächler wrote: [snip] > There is in fact a valid reason why we should not hardcode devpts and I > am thinking of dropping the thought, but none of you even cared to bring > it up, instead you bitch about your weird principles, which you claim to

Re: [arch-general] problem compiling for i586 with new makepkg

> servers, but nothing has come of it yet. > It's worth plugging a reminder that Arch's failure to do this so far is a violation of the GPL for all GPL-licensed packages. This should be implemented as soon as possible. David Moore -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version