-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2013 09:09 PM, David Benfell wrote:
>
> I use both chromium and firefox on an ongoing basis. I'd rather
> just tell the driver to ignore the button.
>
I found xev. It identifies the button as 8.
But it seems like the i
helping me. And the Arch Wiki mouse articles seem
to be leading in a different direction. Can someone point me in the
right direction?
I use both chromium and firefox on an ongoing basis. I'd rather just
tell the driver to ignore the button.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell / benf...@parts-unknown
al, it is probably
prudent to just wait a day.
- --
David Benfell / benf...@parts-unknown.org
Please see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG information (or
the attachment you don't understand)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2013 01:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 02/06/13 18:21, David Benfell wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering if this bit assumes that bash is the shell in use
>> (I happen to prefer zsh).
>>
>
> No. It is for inst
wondering if this bit assumes that bash is the shell in use (I
happen to prefer zsh).
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell / benf...@parts-unknown.org
Please see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG information (or
the attachment you don't understand)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2013 02:32 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> In any case, booting a default installation without init= is
> supported and recommended, and we will make sure it keeps working.
>
Good. That alleviates a lot of my concern.
- --
D
installation instructions, and I
didn't see this.
Is it the Arch recommendation to add this kernel option at boot time?
Or will /sbin/init point to /usr/lib/systemd/systemd for the
foreseeable future?
- --
David Benfell / benf...@parts-unknown.org
Please see https://parts-unknown.org
say, I think it's okay. But I'd like to keep better
abreast of changes--and especially the thinking that goes into
them--so I understand the pacman output when I see it.
- --
David Benfell / benf...@parts-unknown.org
Please see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG informati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2013 12:26 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> On Sunday 12 May 2013 22:32:03 David Benfell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was alarmed, I think unnecessarily, when I saw the message that
>> a symlink for systemd was removed on
track of changes like this so I'm not
surprised?
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell / benf...@parts-unknown.org
Please see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG information (or
the attachment you don't understand)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: U
409]: [system] Activation
via systemd failed for unit
'dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service': Unit
dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service failed to load...ce' for
details.
gdm starts, I am able to select my user and enter a password. Then it
seems to hang. This is a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2013 04:35 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, David Benfell
> wrote:
>
>>
>> So maybe thunderbird uses a separate mechanism for popping up
>> notifications?
>
>
> In Thunderbird
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2013 03:01 AM, Joan Rieu wrote:
> 2013/5/4 David Benfell
>
>> Mostly they seem to originate from Thunderbird, but I'm assuming
>> there are other sources as well.
>>
>
> From what I remember, Thunderb
ed here.
So maybe thunderbird uses a separate mechanism for popping up
notifications?
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell / benf...@parts-unknown.org
Please see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG information (or
the attachment you don't understand)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2013 01:09 AM, Josh Liberty wrote:
> I think you're going about this entirely the wrong way. Which
> desktop environment are you using?
>
Cinnamon. Sometimes Gnome, but mostly Cinnamon.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2013 07:44 PM, XeCycle wrote:
> David Benfell writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I'll have to confess, I'm in way over my head. Am I doing this
>> right?
>>
>> n4rky% gdbus introspect --session --dest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2013 04:18 AM, xecycle wrote:
>
> 在 2013-5-4，下午16:49，David Benfell 写道：
>>> The notification daemon listens on D-Bus session bus at
>>> service org.freedesktop.Notifications, object
>>> /org/freedesktop/Not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2013 08:26 PM, xecycle wrote:
>
> 在 2013-5-4，上午11:22，David Benfell 写道：
>
>> I'm failing to find where to do this. The Settings>Notifications
>> switch does not seem to control notifications--at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm failing to find where to do this. The Settings>Notifications
switch does not seem to control notifications--at least under the
Cinnamon desktop environment.
For me, they take up a huge amount of screen real estate, all too
often right whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2013 11:54 AM, Alexandre Medeiros wrote:
>
> Have you tried starting xfce without a login manager (with startx
> and stuff)?
>
If memory serves--and it's been a while--the command needed is
something like startxfce4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/17/2013 2:27 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> On 4/16/2013 6:43 PM, Dennis Anderson wrote:
>
>> Well gummiboot looks OK, default mkinitcpio seems OK, (you did
>> run mkinitcpio -p linux after reinstalling right).
>
It turns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/16/2013 6:43 PM, Dennis Anderson wrote:
>
> Well gummiboot looks OK, default mkinitcpio seems OK, (you did run
> mkinitcpio -p linux after reinstalling right).
>
Yup. I eventually poked around inside the shell that rEFInd was
dropping me into.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/16/2013 6:43 PM, Dennis Anderson wrote:
>
> Well gummiboot looks OK, default mkinitcpio seems OK, (you did run
> mkinitcpio -p linux after reinstalling right).
>
Yup. I eventually poked around inside the shell that rEFInd was
dropping me into.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:46:46PM +0200, Nelson Marambio wrote:
>
> Hi, Dennis,
>
> you didn't forget to replace 'sata pata scsi' etc. by 'block' ? That
> was my fault a few months ago shortly before an update of the kernel.
> In result, the bootimage couldn't find any harddisk installed.
>
> M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dennis,
On 04/13/2013 08:28 PM, Dennis Anderson wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I have EFI working on an ASUS mobo so maybe I can help. What does
> you arch.conf look like. Sounds lilke that is where the problems
> could be.
>
Here it is, along with a dir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/2013 12:11 PM, David Benfell wrote:
>
> I'm not quite sure what the best way to proceed is at this point.
> I think I'm awfully close to having it working, but it *is* EFI,
> and so far, that's always an adventure.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I haven't seen this one for a while--a long while. I assume it still
means what it used to mean, that is, that I haven't correctly
specified the root partition.
gummiboot is proving to be a bit of an adventure on this Asus X202E.
The gummiboo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/2013 12:43 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>
> It looks like your thumbdrive wasn't as stubborn as was initially
> suspected. Recreating the partition table made it work. What you're
> facing now is an issue with configuration.
>
> My personal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/12/2013 12:32 AM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Those SanDisk drive are a real pain you can use them but you are
> going to have to fdisk it first there is stuff on there that stops
> Linux dead in it's tracks i have several of them the 4Gb on
On 4/12/2013 11:23 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> Before you do that, did you try using the tool mentioned in the Ubuntu
> thread to remove unwanted firmware partitions, if any? If not, you may
> want to format the entire thing with an HP legacy formatting tool.¹
> I've used it successfully in the past to
ing idiotic',
just different from what I expected. My guess is you've nailed it.
I guess I'll head back to Best Buy for a different brand.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG (the attachment you
don't understand) information.
-BEGI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I can't believe I'm having trouble with this. I'm trying to follow the
directions at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/USB_Installation_Media
Specifically:
dd bs=4M if=/path/to/archlinux.iso of=/dev/sdx
Which I translate to:
sudo dd bs=
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:15:29PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
>
> Casting about on the web, I gather this is an ownership/permissions
> issue. That'd be fine and I might know what to do about it if I knew
> where spamd was trying to create it and, for that matter, under what u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Casting about on the web, I gather this is an ownership/permissions
issue. That'd be fine and I might know what to do about it if I knew
where spamd was trying to create it and, for that matter, under what user.
But I don't even know where th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2013 07:24 AM, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-04-03 07:19, David Benfell wrote:
>> Oh, how absolutely embarrassing. Whoever heard of a network
>> device named enp3s2? Really. Here's the service file, complete
>> with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/2/2013 8:31 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've almost got this. My dedicated server appears to be willing to
> boot from the disk, but the network doesn't come up.
>
Oh, how absolutely embarrassing. Whoever
What am I missing?
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG (the attachment you
don't understand) information.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I had managed not to see this:
https://www.archlinux.org/news/mariadb-replaces-mysql-in-repositories/
But it turned up on one of my feeds today, so I went to work. All went
well until the final step, the upgrade:
Phase 3/3: Running 'mysql_fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/2013 03:43 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>
> That's exactly right.
>
> A KVMOIP is basically the same thing, but for systems that don't
> have this capability built natively into their BIOS. The data
> center operator hooks up the KVMOIP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/2013 03:13 PM, Christoph Vigano wrote:
>
> IIRC, by requesting KVMoIP you will get a serial console attached
> to your server onto which you can logon and thus have access to a
> serial console to your server, allowing you to view the boot
>
Please do not change the subject line of this e-mail. Only by this you
make sure that your answer will not be out of context.
Please direct all support issues directly to supp...@contabo.com .
This will guarantee fastest processing possible.
_________
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
>
> Try running seahorse, go to Edit -> Preferences.
>
> Make sure "Automatically synchronize modified keys with key
> servers" is not checked.
>
It was *not* checked. But at least now I know what it is.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I wish I could ask this question intelligently. But I am clueless.
I'm using the Cinnamon desktop manager. Whenever I log in, I get a
message in the upper left hand corner that claims it "can't publish
keys to the network." I haven't seen thi
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:47:22 -0700
Matthew Monaco wrote:
>
> Sorry, I don't have definitive answer. You can check
> ~/.xession-errors and $ journalctl -bp warning for clues. (If you use
> GDM .xsession-errors might have been moved recently.
I only have a ~/.xsession, not .xsession-errors. journa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/2013 06:08 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
>
>
> You can see if anything is running under the terminal with ps -AHf when
> gnome-terminal is running. Check the preferences under the "Title and
Command"
> tab to make sure you haven't overridden your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/2013 03:31 AM, Mika Fischer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> With the
>> ESP at /boot, pacman automatically installs the kernels where they
>> need to be, and no ugly copying hacks are necessary.
>
> Do you me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
All other terminal emulators work. I have checked--thanks to what little
I found on the web that seemed apropos--to be sure that /dev/pts is
mounted (it is). But when I run gnome-terminal, I get no prompt and
typing in commands does not work.
On 03/02/2013 10:32 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>
> which works really beautifully and needs no manual intervention when new
> kernels arrive. However it did take me some time with a lot of help from
> Rod Smith to get it all set up correctly.
>
> Basic steps were:
> 1) Format disks with GPT instead o
On 03/02/2013 11:13 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
Make sure the EFI System Partition is mounted at /boot. Gummiboot
expects this: The /vmlinuz-linux path is relative to the ESP. With the
ESP at /boot, pacman automatically installs the kernels where they
need to be, and no ugly copying hacks are necessa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
So far, my attempt to install Arch Linux on a UEFI system is a total
facepalm moment. The problem is in booting post-install.
So, first, does anyone have actual--and successful--experience
installing Arch on a UEFI system? Yes, I went to the
On 1/5/2013 12:23 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>
> Does anyone have experience with such a UEFI system on this list? Apart
> from the info on the arch wiki and the install wiki info (which I have been
> reading), are systems like this reliable once installed? Does the routine
> pacman update process fo
> > Please report/followup there. > > By the way, it is still not working
for me with prosody 0.8.2-7
I'm just going to have to remember http://bugs.archlinux.org/
Thanks! (And by the way, yes, it is working for me, now.)
Hi all,
It appears that the prosody package dependencies have been updated, but
not the program itself:
atlanta# prosodyctl start
**
Prosody was unable to find luasocket
This package can be obtained in the following ways:
Source:
http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.
Rebuild php-imagick against imagemagick 6.8. AUR packages are
> unsupported and it's your responsibility to rebuild them when a
> soname bump happens in some library.
Yes, my bad. Thank you!
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2012 01:59 AM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
>
> It's an AUR package php-imagick, that you need to recompile.
>
Yes, you are right. I was an idiot for not remembering.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN
;m right that this is a packaging bug, where should I be
reporting it? And if I'm wrong and it is not a packaging bug, what
should I do?
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
this area at that time was seriously out of date.
--
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
know Linode does. I don't know about others.
--
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
On 09/27/2012 11:34 AM, Tobias Frilling wrote:
The -discussion mailing list could serve as an outlet for this need,
rendering the other list more productive via being moderated; The rule
wouldn't be "shut up or be banned", which shouldn't really be
necessary for rational folks like us, but "shu
On 09/18/2012 02:14 AM, Robbie Smith wrote:
Due to the arrangement of the partitions, I don't think creating an
Extended partition will work (they need to be the last one in the
table, don't they?)
There are no extended partitions in UEFI. They're all primary partitions
and you can have more
On 09/11/2012 06:42 PM, Simon Perry wrote:
FWIW, I picked one of your modules at random, and "pear install" told me
to use "pecl install uploadprogress", and it worked fine.
An initial major problem was in the final line of that mess, the one
that said, "PHP Fatal error: Directive 'allow_cal
On 09/11/2012 06:23 PM, Simon Perry wrote:
On 11/09/12, David Benfell wrote:
| Okay, that gets rid of one problem. What about the others?
Can you re-install the modules?
Looks like they might need a re-compile against your current version of
PHP?
There is a 'pear uninstall' a
On 09/11/2012 06:18 PM, Simon Perry wrote:
> I should have added "for starters", I don't think it will fix the
rest of your problems. Unfortunately, I don't use PEAR that much to
offer any further advice.
Our mails crossed. :-)
On 09/11/2012 06:15 PM, Simon Perry wrote:
On 11/09/12, David Benfell wrote:
| PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
| '/usr/lib/php/modules/json.so' - /usr/lib/php/modules/json.so:
| cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown
| on li
Hi all,
Apologies for what I'm sure is an idiot question. Any time I try to do
anything with pear, I get:
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: uploadprogress: Unable to initialize module
Module compiled with module API=20090626
PHPcompiled with module API=20100525
These options need to match
in Unk
if programs have a way of not forking and can simply
run without what I know from my old PDP-11 RSTS/e days as "detaching,"
although systemd is better able to handle programs that do than
daemontools is.
--
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
cratch.
Our (emphasis on the collective) failure to solve this, however, is
debilitating, not only for existing users for whom support is harder
to find, but in terms of attracting future users, not just to Arch but
to the open source community in general.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts
5 August 2012 21:36, David Benfell
> wrote:
>
> On 08/15/2012 11:31 AM, David Benfell wrote:
>>>> On 08/15/2012 10:55 AM, Jameson wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:03 AM, David Benfell
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Also when I lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2012 11:31 AM, David Benfell wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 10:55 AM, Jameson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:03 AM, David Benfell
>> wrote:
>>> Also when I log in, the password is visible.
>
>> The first plac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2012 10:55 AM, Jameson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:03 AM, David Benfell
> wrote:
>> Also when I log in, the password is visible.
>
> The first place I would check for this would be your console
> font/
source, I might still agree with you. ;-)
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQK+p8AAoJELT202JKF+xpLmwP/1a
it looks to me like the problem is with
legacy.conf but I'm not seeing why this should be problematic:
d /run/lock 0755 root root -
d /run/lock/subsys 0755 root root -
d /run/lock/lockdev 0775 root lock -
/run and /run/lock both exist
I've tried rebooting; it didn't help.
Now what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2012 06:44 PM, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:53:10PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
>> I'd add that djb has started several projects that have been, I
>> think, very,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2012 04:08 PM, Brandon Watkins wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Norbert Zeh
> wrote:
>
>> David Benfell [2012.08.14 1535 -0700]:
>>> What I think is unfortunate about the discussion of systemd
>>&g
it must because my
non-standard mounts are present.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQKuVlAAoJELT202JKF+xpkJEP/iX4Jf4WT9+Cac0gtjSeGxTc
ZU/J
v,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=100)
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQKteNAAoJELT202JKF+xpHlkQA
ood, but then dropped them. It is harder to justify using
his stuff when development is largely limited to one man's attention span.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.
lseaudio. I
think it is possible to like one and not the other.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQKtKaAAoJELT202JKF+xpT7MP+wau7MW57X
drawing in the rest of the
pulseaudio toolchain that is clearly problematic.
Great discussion, by the way. I don't fully understand it either, but
given the problems I've had with pulseaudio, I appreciate what seems
to be confirmation that I'm losing nothing by leaving it out.
- --
D
ur to me as something to check
because I was focused on the system coming up for the first time under
systemd.
So I rebooted off a CD-ROM and ran e2fsck manually (with -fy), it ran
cleanly, and when I rebooted off the hard drive, it came up cleanly.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2012 04:09 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:27 AM, David Benfell
> wrote:
>> 2) But I did notice an error that worried me--just because it
>> looks worrying--as it came up:
>>
>> Aug 0
dependencies to pull in, in
this example, a complete gnome. Is that really the fault of upstream?
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQJuyj
blocks
/dev/sda3 is the root partition.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQJdEsAAoJELT202JKF+xpR8EP/RAqqrPz2pumaHET2XLI97UC
s advertised, 1) such evangelism would not be
necessary, and 2) the topic might not come up so often.
But what's really interesting is that the topic appears even here on
an Arch mailing list, since Arch--as far as I know--wouldn't foist
PulseAudio on anybody unless they wanted it.
-
taken
to the relevant lists. The response you received is one I would expect
here, where part of the advantage of this environment is that when one
software package doesn't meet your needs, there are alternatives
available.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
concede that
there are valid points to be made in opposition.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQIFFuAAoJELT202JKF+xp+QIQAJoEOJUXozvyDWmjs/spK6
it from being the
> shell standard because the vast majority of scripts are crafted
> using Bash, a widespread de-facto standard for so long time.
>
Indeed--those incompatibilities are precisely what I like about zsh. ;-)
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/2012 07:57 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> Maybe one day zsh will become the default shell on arch :)
>
That'd get my vote, but I'd be amazed if any distribution ever did
this. Doesn't zsh take more--a lot more-
0.1132.57-2 on x86_64, running xmonad. I get a total freeze of
> chromium (have to kill -9) if I hit C-p, or hit "print" from the
> menu.
>
We could spend a lot of time trying to eliminate possible causes. I am
not seeing this behavior and I am not running xmonad but I am runn
least as much angst among package maintainers about all
this as we've seen on this list.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEB
un at
startup and shutdown by enabling rc-local.service and
rc-local-shutdown.service." The package is not recommended but it exists.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2012 02:28 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> Probably because it's "KillSignal", not "Kill-Signal".
>
Thanks! I'm about to head out the door, but I've corrected the service
files accordingly.
-
nly way to know if
> a service has finished starting.
>
I am indeed finding in many cases I have to use 'forking'.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.o
o it know all the processes
> started from that service. See man systemd.kill KillMode=
>
It turns out I do need KillSignal= for my memcached jobs. But when I
include it in the service file it complains:
Unknown lvalue 'Kill-Signal' in section 'Service'. Ignoring.
I'
27;s what I've got for dictd (which seems like a relatively simple
case):
[Unit]
Description=Dict Server
After=network.target
[Service]
Type=simple
EnvironmentFile=/etc/conf.d/dictd
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/dictd ${DICTD_ARGS} -- ${DICTD_EARGS}
Restart=always
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.ta
sr/lib/udev/,
> so for user-created helper scripts, I think I'd put them in
> /etc/systemd/.
>
That works for me. With some intervening logic to monitor the
jobs--since systemd won't be able to monitor them itself--I think I
can pull this off.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
d stop
some daemons. I'm thinking I definitely do not want to use /etc/rc.d
for this (I had to back out and go back to init and /etc/rc.d is still
in use for that).
Is there some consensus on where such scripts should go?
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
ly, I have encountered other difficulties, but these
are potentially topics for new threads.
It looks to me like C Anthony's approach is a correct approach for
network setups that don't fit into the standard netcfg/network paradigm.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2012 07:49 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:13 AM, David Benfell
> wrote:
>>
>> Even with all those dashes in front of every command, it exits
>> with a code and is plainly unhappy.
ile
in /etc/systemd/system, it still needs to be implemented with the
systemctl enable. If the wiki is clear on this, I missed it.
Thanks!
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigm
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
