Hi,
no there is no issue. I just have little free time to do the update. I will
try to do it this or next week.
Update will come, sorry for a little delay on this topic.
Cheers
Daniel
Phil Uithoven schrieb am Sa., 9. Juli 2016, 14:16:
>
> Is there an issue with updating the mono package?
>
> T
Hi,
I just read an email from Miguel (Mono head developer) that in the next
mono release (I don't know when this will be) the .NET profile 2.0 and 4.0
will be removed. So the reference assemblies of .NET 2.0 and 4.0 will be no
longer in the package. As it seems the new mono release will have the
v
Hi,
now that Window Maker development resumed and the new source for the
official Window Maker package is the git repository of crm, there is no
need anymore to have the crm-git package in the [extra] repository
beside the official stable package. I will move it to AUR soon and will
maintain
Am 05.10.2011 07:52, schrieb Ángel Velásquez:
2011/10/5 Simon Schneider:
Am 05.10.2011 07:38 schrieb "Madhurya Kakati":
Hi,
I saw cheat cubes for Fedora and Ubuntu. However someone has created a
cheatcube for archlinux but it is in Spanish. I was wondering if anyone
could translate it into engl
No signoffs? No one who use rp-pppoe?
Am 18.04.2011 09:14, schrieb Daniel Isenmann:
I have fixed:
FS#22481 - [rp-pppoe] remove from base group
FS#20925 - [rp-pppoe] pppoe-server has wrong hardcoded path to
pppoe-plugin
Please signoff i686 and x86_64. I can't test it, because I don
I have fixed:
FS#22481 - [rp-pppoe] remove from base group
FS#20925 - [rp-pppoe] pppoe-server has wrong hardcoded path to pppoe-plugin
Please signoff i686 and x86_64. I can't test it, because I don't use it.
Daniel
Hi,
like requested as a feature request (FS#22550) and as a solution to one
bug (FS#22423), I have splitted the wicd package into two seperated
packages. From now on there is
wicd:
All stuff you need to run the wicd daemon and the wicd-cli and
wicd-curses interfaces
wicd-gtk:
All stuff you
Hi,
today I have released a new release of the windowmaker package. The
important change is the GNUstep directory. I have changed this
to /usr/lib/GNUstep. It was requested as a bug report
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15301) and it’s now equal to Debian’s
GNUstep directory location.
That means
Hi,
this is a small fix for the bug reported here:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=699763
Now, you have to set explicit the plugin path to the kernel mode
plugin if you want to use it. So, it's up to you if you need it or
not and it won't be set anymore as default, because it generated
Am 28.01.2010 13:25, schrieb Xianwen Chen:
Hello friends,
Starting from late Dec., my laptop goes black screen after "waiting for udev uevents
to be processed", after updating kernel to 2.26.32.*. How can I solve the problem?
Regards,
Wen
Have a look here:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic
Hi,
there is a new version of wicd in [testing]. In the past there were
always problems in upgrading wicd, so I have decided to put it in
[testing] first. Please test it and give me some signoffs.
Big changelog:
1.7.0:
Changes for Packagers:
- Wicd now supports a -k option, which
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:20:32 +0100
Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is just a small fix for FS#13876 -[rp-pppoe] package: .so file
> in /etc (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13876).
> The kernel-mode plugin is now under /usr/lib/rp-pppoe/rp-pppoe.so and
> the initial co
Hi,
this is just a small fix for FS#13876 -[rp-pppoe] package: .so file
in /etc (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13876).
The kernel-mode plugin is now under /usr/lib/rp-pppoe/rp-pppoe.so and
the initial config file /etc/ppp/pppoe.conf has the new path included.
Existing config file must be changed
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:11:02 +0300
Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
> G'day,
>
> Anyone (Thomas?) knows where autowifi has gone?
> http://www.archlinux.org/~thomas/autowifi gives 404 Page Not Found.
>
It's now here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/autowifi/
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:27:20 -0400
Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Daniel
> Isenmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:08:21 +0200
> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
> >> > Please signoff both archite
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:10:06 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
> >>> Yes I have removed. I have asked before on the dev-public but
> >>> nobody answered. I will release a new pkgrel with added patch
> >>> soon.
> >>>
>
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:38:00 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
> > Yes I have removed. I have asked before on the dev-public but nobody
> > answered. I will release a new pkgrel with added patch soon.
> >
> > Any other things about the patches
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:27:20 -0400
Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Daniel
> Isenmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:08:21 +0200
> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
> >> > Please signoff both archite
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:08:21 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
> > Please signoff both architectures. The new version fixes
> > CVE-2009-0692 (https://www.isc.org/node/468).
> >
> > I have cleaned up the PKGBUILD and removes our patches. So pleas
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:21:21 +0200
Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> Please signoff both architectures. The new version fixes CVE-2009-0692
> (https://www.isc.org/node/468).
>
> I have cleaned up the PKGBUILD and removes our patches. So please test
> it carefully and report any issue to
Please signoff both architectures. The new version fixes CVE-2009-0692
(https://www.isc.org/node/468).
I have cleaned up the PKGBUILD and removes our patches. So please test
it carefully and report any issue to the bugtracker or the ML. On
works here on my PC, but it needs definitely more testing.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Alexander Kotlerman wrote:
> I've got a question for everyone:
>
> Why is it that kdemod is not cleanly packaged in arch linux? I mean,
> I try to install kdemod-extragear group but I can't beacuse there are
> conflicts: packages like kdemod-extragear-bes
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:04:54 +0100
Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:05:26 +0100
> Daniel Isenmann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > please signoff for both architectures. I can't test it because I
> > don't use it.
> >
> > Follo
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:05:26 +0100
Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please signoff for both architectures. I can't test it because I don't
> use it.
>
> Following bug was fixed:
>
> [pptp-1.7.2-1] try to use /bin/ip instead of /usr/sbin/ip
> FS#11939
Hi,
please signoff for both architectures. I can't test it because I don't
use it.
Following bug was fixed:
[pptp-1.7.2-1] try to use /bin/ip instead of /usr/sbin/ip
FS#11939 (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11939)
Cheers,
Daniel
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:22:12 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Back on topic:
> One user talking on an ML does not make a package important. I have
> not yet run into a site that requires moonlight/silverlight. So, until
> we're actually going to get usage out of this package, putting it in
> extra is
On Thu, January 22, 2009 12:28 pm, Amanai wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
> wrote:
>
>> On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
>>
>>> The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will
>>> this
>>> be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
>>
>> Currently
In testing for both arches. Please signoff, I can't test it because I
don't use it.
Daniel
Changes:
- port for Solaris 10/11
- make copyright and license clearer
- add packet reordering test code for pptpd testing
- ignore transient send errors
- fix flaw in return status check of selec
28 matches
Mail list logo
