On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:00 PM, solsTiCe d'Hiver
wrote:
> ooops
> in fact, it works if I run it from a command line in a terminal.
>
> but not from gnome menu.
>
>
It is not a bug. Your .bashrc or .zshrc files are sourced only in terminal.
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:37:00 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:23:14 +0300, Aleksis Jauntēvs
>
> wrote:
> > I dont think that repo.db should be signed and it is enough to sign only
> > the
> > packages. As I understand so far the only reason to
;s why we muse discuss it thoroughly. A good plan will
> lead to a good and secure implementation. We should not rush anything.
I completely agree with this. As someone before said - we can not just throw
some code at people and make them think that everything is secure now.
--
Aleksis Jauntēvs
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 16:39:53 Allan McRae wrote:
> On 28/04/10 23:32, Aleksis Jauntēvs wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The idea is to implement package signing for Arch similar to rpm GPG
> > package signing.
>
> Good to see someone interested in this. I sugge
Hello,
The idea is to implement package signing for Arch similar to rpm GPG package
signing. Short description follows.
Use case for developers:
1. Dev bulds package with f.e. "-sign" switch.
2. Dev enters passphrase.
3. makepkg builds the package and creates detached signature (now we
have 2
5 matches
Mail list logo
