On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
>
> the concept looks great, although i don't know anything about the
> implementation/usage.
There's quite a few things out there with this same idea:
- Ditz (http://ditz.ru
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Flavio Costa wrote:
>> What about SVN autoprops, can't you just attach a "pre-made"
>> '~/.subversion/config' in the wiki and people can grab it from there.
>
> I was going to suggest this too. I don't recall
Well, thanks for the help everyone...at this point, I think I'm giving
up on my GPT dreams and am going to switch back to straight-up MBR. I
have been able to patch and use GRUB when booting off the installer
CD, and launching the GRUB console from /mnt/sbin/grub works like a
charm. But, as soon as
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10639
Thanks! I've applied that updated patch, and GRUB seems to install
okay, but when I boot I don't get the standard GRUB menu, I just get
dropped into the GRUB console...my menu.lst looks like this:
# (0) Arc
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Aaron Schaefer wrote:
> I'm trying to get GRUB installed on a pure GPT disk (I didn't know it
> was best to make a hybrid MBR/GPT), and it looks like a patch was
> added back in March 2008 for this
> (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9864), bu
I'm trying to get GRUB installed on a pure GPT disk (I didn't know it
was best to make a hybrid MBR/GPT), and it looks like a patch was
added back in March 2008 for this
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9864), but it continues to fail.
My layout is as follows on the drive:
/dev/sda1 /boot
/dev/sd
Since I can't reply to the dev mailing list thread:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 May 2009, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> That means all plugins need to be rebuild and some users that set fixed
>> pathes in .
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> I thought I was set up as a list owner, and I never got a message
> saying things were being blocked or in the queue. I'm not sure what
> happened. Are you certain you confirmed your subscription, and then
> sent from the correct email address?
>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> What's pacman-dev protected from?
>
> I think he meant he wasn't subscribed :)
I subscribed and sent the patch, but it never showed up. I asked on
IRC and someone said you had to be approved, so I assumed I didn't
have permissions to post
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Aaron Schaefer wrote:
> I made a patch and submitted it to pacman-dev, so the work is
> done...if you chose to implement it.
Nix that...forgot pacman-dev was protected, so I have filed a feature
request with the patch. There has been a bit more
disc
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> It's not so much a preference as it is the fact that we won't be
> gaining much, if anything, from this change, and the change is going
> to take work. Making announcements, changing the official repos over,
> dealing with bug reports, etc et
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Jeff Mickey wrote:
> It's pretty far out there.
> Not to mention I've put sha1 and md5 in a lot of my packages, and I
> haven't heard of any attacks working against both algorithms to create
> a buildable malicious executable. And even if that wild and
> unresearc
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> It's not so much a preference as it is the fact that we won't be
> gaining much, if anything, from this change, and the change is going
> to take work. Making announcements, changing the official repos over,
> dealing with bug reports, etc et
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Have you never had a corrupted download? "Alright, 356K... wait, not a
> tar file? what the hell?"
>
> checksums have been used to "check" transmission of data for ages.
> Hell, your router even does some form of checksumming on packets it
>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> And remember makepkg source checksums are COMPLETELY different than
> signed packages. I'm not even sure why these two are being mentioned
> in the same light.
>
> -Dan
The correlation came from the fact that the quote of Aaron's was from
the "C
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Haven't we been over this like a hundred times? md5sums are not used
> for security. Not ever. Nope. Nada.
>
> We use them solely to detect whether or not the download completed as
> expected. And sha256 is going way overboard here.
It has b
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Currently, however, couldn't you just supply both md5 and sha1
> checksums to cover all bases?
You could put them both in the PKGBUILD in order to be able to upload
it to the AUR, but anyone who downloads it would get verification
errors un
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> I addressed this "upstream" in an earlier patch, so this will be fixed
> in pacman 3.3.0:
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=496b687c3d4a56641051700e7c4e5e21b9c6607c;hp=baf58525553db8f1e680de16793b147c88df59e2
>
> -Dan
At the request of the upstream developer, I was attempting to change
the md5sums in my tarsnap PKGBUILD
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22963) to use sha256
instead, and ran across a couple of issues. The way makepkg works,
when you set INTEGRITY_CHECK in makepkg.conf, those values effect
I'd guess it's because that is what is recommended by the FHS:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM
I kind of like having it separate, and think it makes sense, even
though that's not what I've always been used to. It's definitely a
more consistent an
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Ralph Alvy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it that after the last few upgrades with pacman I can't use
> any 'vga=nnn' setting anymore in my grub menu.lst? I used to
> use 'vga=792' 'vga=795', if memory serves me here. I keep ending up with a
> message at boot t
>>> It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a user
>>> has packages in group base-devel installed.
>>
>> Ideally, the user should have BOTH base and base-devel installed for
>> package building.
>
> +1.
> When user omits any package from base - it's on his/her own risk
>> Mmmm gmail does NOT work the right way, it automatically top-posts, as you
>> have done too.
> Another issue is that it's posting in the most hideous format you can
> use for email: HTML.
You might be interested in taking a look at Sup
(http://sup.rubyforge.org/) which is a console-based email
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> In the past I had set-up some software I use (mpop) to read the root CAs
> certificates from /usr/share/curl/curl-ca-bundle.crt but it seems that some
> update broke that. I could easily find an al
24 matches
Mail list logo
