Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread Greg Minshall via arch-general
Eli, > And I would like to reiterate: really, really, REALLY, do not use > --overwrite unless you know what you're doing or have done as the OP did > and asked (and been told to do so). The entire *point* of the option is > to declare that your Arch installation is broken and you need to tell > pa

Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread karx via arch-general
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 7:54 PM Javier via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 9/9/20 5:59 PM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:41:28 -0600 > > Javier via arch-general wrote: > > > >> Hi ! > >> > >> On Today's upgrade: > >> > >> % pacman -Syu > >> ::

Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 9/9/20 8:55 PM, karx via arch-general wrote: > Shouldn't we put something up on the main page about this? You're right. Let me go put up a news post for this. How does this sound? Title --- Don't do stupid things without asking Body --- In the event you ever get told a package

Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 9/9/20 7:41 PM, Javier via arch-general wrote: > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) > tigervnc: /usr/sbin exists in filesystem (owned by filesystem) > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. > > Usually that get fixed by using "--overwrite /usr/sbin". But I find > it w

Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread Javier via arch-general
On 9/9/20 5:59 PM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:41:28 -0600 > Javier via arch-general wrote: > >> Hi ! >> >> On Today's upgrade: >> >> % pacman -Syu >> :: Synchronizing package databases... >> ... >> Packages (9) ... tigervnc-1.11.0-1 ... >> ... >> tigervnc-1.11.0

Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread Amish via arch-general
On 10/09/20 5:11 am, Javier via arch-general wrote: Usually that get fixed by using "--overwrite /usr/sbin". But I find it wrong for tigervnc to own "/usr/sbin", so I think in this case tigervnc is not right. Would this be the case, or it's OK for tigervnc to be the owner and then to overwrit

Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread Doug Newgard via arch-general
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:41:28 -0600 Javier via arch-general wrote: > Hi ! > > On Today's upgrade: > > % pacman -Syu > :: Synchronizing package databases... > ... > Packages (9) ... tigervnc-1.11.0-1 ... > ... > tigervnc-1.11.0-1-x86_64 131.3 MiB 3.51 MiB/s 00:37 > [##

[arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

2020-09-09 Thread Javier via arch-general
Hi ! On Today's upgrade: % pacman -Syu :: Synchronizing package databases... ... Packages (9) ... tigervnc-1.11.0-1 ... ... tigervnc-1.11.0-1-x86_64 131.3 MiB 3.51 MiB/s 00:37 [] 100% (9/9) checking keys in keyring