On 8/27/20 3:37 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 15:27:19 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> On 8/27/20 3:17 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 14:34:41 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
Why is it bad if you have it installed but no
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 15:27:19 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 8/27/20 3:17 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 14:34:41 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> >> Why is it bad if you have it installed but not running?
> >
> >
> > FS#41834 as an exampl
On 8/27/20 3:17 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 14:34:41 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> Why is it bad if you have it installed but not running?
>
>
> FS#41834 as an example. Or FS#28819. There is just no good reason to keep
> dragging purely historic crap li
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 14:34:41 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> Why is it bad if you have it installed but not running?
FS#41834 as an example. Or FS#28819. There is just no good reason to keep
dragging purely historic crap like inetutils on so many Arch systems just
because a fe
On 8/23/20 10:50 AM, Geert Hendrickx via arch-general wrote:
> Hi
>
> A number of packages depend on inetutils merely for the `hostname` command.
> Common packages include xorg-xinit and mariadb, which makes that inetutils
> is still installed on a large number of Arch systems, although its other
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 16:50:03 +0200, Geert Hendrickx via arch-general wrote:
> Hi
>
> A number of packages depend on inetutils merely for the `hostname` command.
> Common packages include xorg-xinit and mariadb, which makes that inetutils
> is still installed on a large number of Arch systems,
6 matches
Mail list logo
