On 8/21/20 12:25 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> That might have been an interesting precautionary measure for netctl
>> 1.18, at least for printing a message advising people to reenable the
>> service.
> Oh, for the record -- it looks like netctl already did this:
>
> https://git.arch
On 8/17/20 5:56 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> Couldn't there also be a post install that does a reenable for each netctl
>> profile found in /etc/systemd/system as another option to avoid this SNAFU?
>
> That might have been an interesting precautionary measure for netctl
> 1.18, at least for printing
On 8/20/20 3:52 PM, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote:
> Now I don't understand all the defensiveness - let's all work together
> to improve things. This is not a non-issue.
That's the Arch I fondly remember. You are on this list either because (1) you
want to help, or (2) you need help. B
On 8/20/20 4:24 AM, Amin Vakil via arch-general wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not an Arch Linux Developer myself, so I'm not allowed to reply to
> this email on arch-dev-public.
>
Gaetan began at a time when things were different at Arch, there was just
arch-dev, and it was open to community posts und
> I don't see what all the fuss is about
>
> If you're using Arch, then you should:
>
> 1. Check Arch news before running update
> 2. Update regularly
> 3. Watch output from pacman for warnings/advice
> 4. Run pacdiff after update and before reboot
>
> After step 4 there are no longer any pacnew fi
On 8/20/20 12:27 PM, Amish via arch-general wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I have few packages (eg. pam_geoip, pam_abl) in custom repo which use
libpam.
Can someone clarify if PAM upgrade to 1.4.0 would require those packages
to be rebuilt?
I don't think so. I have eleven packages that require Pam.
Pam up
Em agosto 20, 2020 2:28 das escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:25 PM Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
I believe your printer works without hplip and using the driverless
option. That's something you can also try.
I tried it your way too. I removed hplip. It seemed plausible too.
When the printer
Hello,
I have few packages (eg. pam_geoip, pam_abl) in custom repo which use
libpam.
Can someone clarify if PAM upgrade to 1.4.0 would require those packages
to be rebuilt?
I have few systems using those PAM modules and if those modules break
after updating and rebooting then I will lose a
Hello,
I'm not an Arch Linux Developer myself, so I'm not allowed to reply to
this email on arch-dev-public.
But just out of curiosity and to learn something, would you
care to share with us what majority's views is in conflict with your views?
Best Regards,
Amin Vakil
On 8/20/20 3:13 AM, Gaeta
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 07:10, Kusoneko wrote:
>
> I think he's trying to imply that pacman stores a copy of the archive
> containing the previous version somewhere and that pacman should extract
> the config files from both and see if something changed before providing a
> .pacnew. Only thing is,
On 8/19/20 15:02, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that Arch is not for the "average user" and some background
> knowledge is expected, but this was the first time I needed a boot stick
> since I think at least one year.
>
> Some minutes ago I did a regular system update and after that de
11 matches
Mail list logo
