Hi,
Le 3 février 2020 00:58:02 GMT+01:00, Friedrich Strohmaier
a écrit :
>Hi archers,
>
>Packages "jami-gnome" and "libjamiclient" are flagged out of date since
>2019-11-16 / 2019-11-20. There are two new releases in place.
>
>I tried to contact the maintainer twice but nothing happened.
>
>I re
Hi archers,
Packages "jami-gnome" and "libjamiclient" are flagged out of date since
2019-11-16 / 2019-11-20. There are two new releases in place.
I tried to contact the maintainer twice but nothing happened.
I retrieved the maintainers (Bruno Pagani) mail adress from this mailinglist.
I suspect
Could a tempfile be used or the file name from the URL instead of the
content disposition? At least prior to signature verification? Seems this
could still be "exploited" by specifying a file name of another source in
the package perhaps? Makes me wonder about the ::dest suffix of sources
albeit th
On 2/2/20 10:59 PM, Christopher W. via arch-general wrote:
> Hi. The wiki states that database signatures for pacman are currently
> a work in progress. It's been that way for a long time, so I assume
> there is no "progress" happening. What is currently in the way of this
> much-needed security fe
Hi. The wiki states that database signatures for pacman are currently
a work in progress. It's been that way for a long time, so I assume
there is no "progress" happening. What is currently in the way of this
much-needed security feature to be fully implemented?
Right now, pacman is taking untrust
5 matches
Mail list logo
