Wow nice, but too bad i am in India :(
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, 12:06 am Jerome Leclanche, wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> The Arch Linux team is organizing two full-day hackathons on January 30th
> and 31st in Brussels, the two days before FOSDEM (https://fosdem.org/2020/
> ).
>
> Lunch and drinks will be pro
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 18:33:19 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>Who said anything about System V init? Why would System V init be
>needed for portability?
Running startup scripts by using run levels isn't that uncommon outside
of Linux.
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 18:33:19 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>The thread started on arch-dev-public; replies on arch-general occurred
>when members of the community wished to discuss the matter as well.
>Hope that helps. :)
Hi Eli,
yes, it's helpful ;).
Regards,
Ralf
PS: I prefer bas
On 1/4/20 9:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jan 2020 12:41:26 +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>> Arch users may be producing code for non-Arch, non-Linux, systems.
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> Pff! Bash is the most used login shell for Linux for good reasons.
> Sometimes I like i
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 23:46:26 +0100, Morten Linderud via arch-general
wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 11:43:03PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Do we manually change the "EXTENSION DEFAULTS" and/or something else?
^need to
>This is a devtools change, the `makepkg.conf` supplied with pacman
>
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 11:43:03PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jan 2020 20:35:55 -, Arch Linux: Recent news updates:
> Robin Broda wrote:
> >our package compression scheme has changed from xz (.pkg.tar.xz) to
> >[zstd(.pkg.tar.zst)]
>
> Hi,
>
> what needs to be
On Sat, 04 Jan 2020 20:35:55 -, Arch Linux: Recent news updates:
Robin Broda wrote:
>our package compression scheme has changed from xz (.pkg.tar.xz) to
>[zstd(.pkg.tar.zst)]
Hi,
what needs to be done to build local .pkg.tar.zst packages?
If I build local packages, they are still .pkg.tar.
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 21:45, Lone_Wolf wrote:
> The proper solution is to file a bug to have the package makedepend on
> xorgproto .
Done.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65052
On 04-01-2020 22:27, Piscium via arch-general wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 21:17, Neven Sajko wrote:
I assume you did not hear about the following:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64892
Thanks. Yes, I had seen that, but that bug is closed and if there is
an answer in it to my question above
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 21:27, Piscium wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 21:17, Neven Sajko wrote:
> >
> > I assume you did not hear about the following:
> >
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64892
>
> Thanks. Yes, I had seen that, but that bug is closed and if there is
> an answer in it to my que
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 21:17, Neven Sajko wrote:
>
> I assume you did not hear about the following:
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64892
Thanks. Yes, I had seen that, but that bug is closed and if there is
an answer in it to my question above I don't know what it is.
The xf86-input-evdev pac
I assume you did not hear about the following:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64892
Hi,
I use a customised version of xf86-input-evdev (I tweaked the source
code to better support my trackball). This package is now broken as
xorgproto used to provide resourceproto and scrnsaverproto but the
current version does not provide it anymore.
I suppose somebody will fix this broken pack
Le samedi 4 janvier 2020 16:50:24 CET Neven Sajko via arch-general a écrit :
> http://www.etalabs.net/sh_tricks.html
Thank you very much. Your 'echo' insight and fundamentals highlight differences
between professionals and amateurs like me !
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 15:50:24 +, Neven Sajko wrote:
>http://www.etalabs.net/sh_tricks.html
Thank you :)!
Hi list,
The Arch Linux team is organizing two full-day hackathons on January 30th
and 31st in Brussels, the two days before FOSDEM (https://fosdem.org/2020/).
Lunch and drinks will be provided, and other activities such as board games
are on the menu for the later hours / evenings.
If you are in
> Actually I wasn't interested to reply at all, I'm just curious about
> information related to POSIX vs Linux, IOW I'm interested in learning
> by reading, but it's a broken thread.
Maybe you would like this:
https://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html
http://www.etalabs.net/sh_tricks.html
> Linux isn't POSIX, period!
I think Linux and its userspace (musl and glibc) try the hardest to be
POSIX. Don't they get the first implementations of new POSIX APIs,
compared to Darwin or the BSDs?
On Sat, 04 Jan 2020 12:41:26 +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Arch users may be producing code for non-Arch, non-Linux, systems.
Happy New Year!
Pff! Bash is the most used login shell for Linux for good reasons.
Sometimes I like it faster, hence I like to use dash, sometimes I like
portability to at
Hi Seblu,
> Our scripts are not written POSIX compatible (i.e they rely on more
> tools than the standard). Do you still know people writing POSIX
> compatible scripts nowadays (students excluded)?
Yes, lots of projects that target Unix systems, not just Linux, stick to
POSIX for their build scri
20 matches
Mail list logo
