Re: [arch-general] How to name a package for the drm-openchrome tree?

2019-06-16 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 6/16/19 4:21 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote: > On 16/06/2019 21:12, Marc Ranolfi via arch-general wrote: >> I think it's also possible to have only one package (and two config files >> 'config.i686' and 'config.x86_64'). But I don't know if that is good >> practice. > > This is definitely possib

Re: [arch-general] How to name a package for the drm-openchrome tree?

2019-06-16 Thread Jonathon Fernyhough
On 16/06/2019 21:12, Marc Ranolfi via arch-general wrote: > I think it's also possible to have only one package (and two config files > 'config.i686' and 'config.x86_64'). But I don't know if that is good > practice. This is definitely possible and the approach Manjaro currently uses for `arch=(i6

Re: [arch-general] How to name a package for the drm-openchrome tree?

2019-06-16 Thread Marc Ranolfi via arch-general
Thank you David. If I may ask a related question - considering this package would be most useful for Arch Linux 32, how should I provide support for both x86_64 and i686? The kernel packages I've seen in the AUR only support x86_64. Should I make two separate packages - i.e. one like "i686- linu

Re: [arch-general] Is it secure to just sign repository databases?

2019-06-16 Thread Levente Polyak via arch-general
On June 16, 2019 5:57:34 PM GMT+02:00, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >That being said, if you have signed the repository db then as you >mentioned the sha256 checksums for the package file are securely >signed, >so you are guaranteed that use of pacman -S pkgname will securely >verify >tha

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Mkinitcpio replacement with Dracut

2019-06-16 Thread Genes Lists via arch-general
On 6/15/19 5:12 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote: ... > > I need to do more work ... perhaps test with the --madadmconf flag when > building the initrd is next step. > I confirm that building the initrd with --mdadmconf fixes the problem assembling the raid disks using dracut - this happen

Re: [arch-general] Is it secure to just sign repository databases?

2019-06-16 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 6/16/19 10:44 AM, brent s. wrote: > On 6/16/19 5:03 AM, Manuel Reimer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I run a repository locally that I would like to share to the public. >> >> The build is mostly automated. That's why I don't want to sign each >> individual package. The private key is not stored on the

Re: [arch-general] Is it secure to just sign repository databases?

2019-06-16 Thread brent s.
On 6/16/19 5:03 AM, Manuel Reimer wrote: > Hello, > > I run a repository locally that I would like to share to the public. > > The build is mostly automated. That's why I don't want to sign each > individual package. The private key is not stored on the build machine > and I want to sign the resu

[arch-general] Is it secure to just sign repository databases?

2019-06-16 Thread Manuel Reimer
Hello, I run a repository locally that I would like to share to the public. The build is mostly automated. That's why I don't want to sign each individual package. The private key is not stored on the build machine and I want to sign the resulting stuff externally. The easiest way would be a