On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 16:13:23 +0100, Andy Pieters wrote:
>I'm sorry to intrude here but how can that be related?
It's not related, it's just a hint to workaround issues, if a
migration has got advantages.
Hello
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 3:34 AM Bjoern Franke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently wanted to switch from grub to syslinux, but it could not boot
> my /boot-partition, because it uses XFS.
>
> Unfortunately only syslinux 6.04 supports XFS, while we stick on 6.03.
> 6.04 is somehow a "testing" vers
On 12/21/18 10:38 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
...
Debian has patches for both -- neither of which the syslinux developer
community has responded to, though given that they've only committed 2
patches in the last year, both of which were in response to a syslinux
thread entitled "Is s
On 12/21/18 6:34 AM, Bjoern Franke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently wanted to switch from grub to syslinux, but it could not boot
> my /boot-partition, because it uses XFS.
>
> Unfortunately only syslinux 6.04 supports XFS, while we stick on 6.03.
> 6.04 is somehow a "testing" version, thought it has
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 3:37 PM Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
wrote:
>
> A long time ago I migrated from GRUB2 to syslinux. In my case the file
> system wasn't/isn't an issue, but the migration to syslinux had/has
> pitfalls for me, too. Dual-monitor usage on demand is one of those
> issues. Dunno
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:34:42 +0100, Bjoern Franke wrote:
>I recently wanted to switch from grub to syslinux, but it could not
>boot my /boot-partition, because it uses XFS.
A long time ago I migrated from GRUB2 to syslinux. In my case the file
system wasn't/isn't an issue, but the migration to sys
Hi,
I recently wanted to switch from grub to syslinux, but it could not boot
my /boot-partition, because it uses XFS.
Unfortunately only syslinux 6.04 supports XFS, while we stick on 6.03.
6.04 is somehow a "testing" version, thought it has been out for 2
years, so I marked 6.03 as "out of date".
7 matches
Mail list logo
