Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
>IIUC you recommend to install and remove the package ceph. > >[rocketmouse@archlinux tmp]$ asp checkout ceph >Cloning into 'ceph'... >done. >[rocketmouse@archlinux tmp]$ cat ceph/trunk/ceph.sysusers >u ceph 340 - /run/ceph Oops, or do you imply to remove the user, after the package is removed

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:59:19 -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: >On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:52:55 +0100 >Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:34:12 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >> >Probably I should create the folder to fix the problem. Which owner >> >and acces

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Doug Newgard via arch-general
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:52:55 +0100 Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:34:12 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > >Probably I should create the folder to fix the problem. Which owner > >and access rights are needed? > > No, use /usr/lib/sysusers.d/ to declare the user. >

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Doug Newgard via arch-general
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:33:49 +0100 Andy Pieters wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:28 PM Peter Nabbefeld > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > because of a performance problem I've checked services and noticed this > > line: > > ● shadow.service > > loaded failed failedVe

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:34:12 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >Probably I should create the folder to fix the problem. Which owner >and access rights are needed? No, use /usr/lib/sysusers.d/ to declare the user. [root@archlinux rocketmouse]# apropos sysusers.d sysusers.d (5) - Declarative all

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
PPS: On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:28:40 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >Probably the user is created only if whole ceph is installed, too? $ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/sysusers.d/ceph.conf /usr/lib/sysusers.d/ceph.conf is owned by ceph 13.2.1-2

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Good Morning, thank You for Your reply. 1. I don't edit /etc/passwd nor /etc/group manually. 2. As I've already pointed out, it's the incomplete ceph-libs user "ceph", which misses its home directory "/run/ceph". It seems, some install script didn't work correctly (e.g. I'd never create a h

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Pieters
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:28 PM Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > > Hello, > > because of a performance problem I've checked services and noticed this > line: > ● shadow.service > loaded failed failedVerify integrity of password > and group files > > > So I checked this service a

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
PS: When editing password or group files you should use vipw and vigr and FWIW to edit the sudoers file it's common to use visudo. The EDITOR variable allows to replace vi by an editor of your choice.

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:28:40 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >As system seems to run without problems (other than performance), I've >got two questions: > >1. Do I need the shadow service? Why? If verifying the integrity of group files and/or password files fails, I wouldn't call it an install "wit

[arch-general] Problems with shadow service

2018-12-12 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Hello, because of a performance problem I've checked services and noticed this line: ● shadow.service loaded failed failedVerify integrity of password and group files So I checked this service and got this output: $ systemctl status shadow ● shadow.service - Verify