On 2018-09-19T11:22:16, frede...@ofb.net wrote:
> > > Well, prior to the recent BIND releease, the default had been "yes" -
> > > which means "no" for me.
> > ...
> > 2. I'm not sure what you mean by the yes-means-no syntax. The URL that you
> > provided seems pretty cut and dry.
> > ...
> > >
> > Well, prior to the recent BIND releease, the default had been "yes" -
> > which means "no" for me.
> ...
> 2. I'm not sure what you mean by the yes-means-no syntax. The URL that you
> provided seems pretty cut and dry.
> ...
> > dnssec-validation yes; #does validate (requires a trusted-keys
On 2018-09-13T12:31:28, frede...@ofb.net wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 06:49:45AM -0700, Pallissard, Matthew wrote:
> > > I had to add "dnssec-validation yes;" to /etc/named.conf. I have a
> >
> > Are you sure you didn't want these values?
> >
> > dnssec-enable no;
> > dnssec-validation no;
>
On 19/09/2018 17.00, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> On 9/19/18, ProgAndy wrote:
>
>> There are LTS releases planned by AdoptOpenJDK, though. For now, Java 8
>> and Java 11 are declared as supported until at least 2022 [1]. These
>> versions may be of interest for Arch Linux.
>
> I'm n
On 9/19/18, ProgAndy wrote:
> There are LTS releases planned by AdoptOpenJDK, though. For now, Java 8
> and Java 11 are declared as supported until at least 2022 [1]. These
> versions may be of interest for Arch Linux.
I'm not a Java developer anymore and probably unaware of new stuff,
and what
Am 19.09.18 um 13:41 schrieb Olli:
> On 19.09.18 10:41, Leandro Papi via arch-general wrote:
>> The fact that Java 10 replaces Java 9 is a call made by Oracle, as
>> described in their roadmap
>> (https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html)
>> [...]Java SE 9 was a non‑LTS releas
On 19.09.18 10:41, Leandro Papi via arch-general wrote:
> The fact that Java 10 replaces Java 9 is a call made by Oracle, as
> described in their roadmap
> (https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html)
> [...]Java SE 9 was a non‑LTS release and immediately superseded by
> Java SE
If I may pitch in with my 2 cents,
The fact that Java 10 replaces Java 9 is a call made by Oracle, as
described in their roadmap
(https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html)
[...]Java SE 9 was a non‑LTS release and immediately superseded by
Java SE 10 (also non‑LTS), Java SE 10
8 matches
Mail list logo
