Am 15.09.18 um 19:54 schrieb Olli:
> LTS versions are only provided by Oracle for their JDK, not for the
> OpenJDK. This graphic explains it quite well:
> https://medium.com/codefx-weekly/no-free-java-lts-version-b850192745fb
There won't be any free LTS releases from Oracle, but the AdoptOpenJDK
p
On 15/09/2018 14:22, Olli wrote:
> Each new version is replacing the previous
> one so that there is always only one (the latest) supported version.
I think there are technically two supported releases, a long-term- and
short-term-supported release. The current LTS is OpenJDK 8, the next LTS
will
On 15.09.18 10:56, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> up to JDK 9 I didn't have problems upgrading, but since JDK 10 it always
> wants to replace JDK 9, and I guess it will become worse with JDK 11 etc.
starting with Java 9, the OpenJDK changed its release cycle to publish a
new version every six month. Eac
I have a related question. I tried arch's openjdk packages and those
were successful in displaying Swing UIs.
Then, to check out newer JDKs and IBM's OpenJ9, I grabbed a
build from https://adoptopenjdk.net, and I just couldn't get
any Swing UI to display. It reported many exceptions and that
was i
Op 15 sep. 2018 10:56 schreef "Peter Nabbefeld" :
Hello,
up to JDK 9 I didn't have problems upgrading, but since JDK 10 it always
wants to replace JDK 9, and I guess it will become worse with JDK 11 etc.
[...] "IgnorePkg = jdk9-openjdk [...]
As a Java developer, I need to be able to have multip
Hello,
up to JDK 9 I didn't have problems upgrading, but since JDK 10 it always
wants to replace JDK 9, and I guess it will become worse with JDK 11 etc.
I've set "IgnorePkg = jdk9-openjdk jre9-openjdk jre9-openjdk-headless
openjdk9-doc openjdk9-src" in pacman.conf, so now I'm getting warni
6 matches
Mail list logo