On 12/03/2017 11:39 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Seems like it is already fixed under the title "Remove useless conflict"
>
> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/php&id=e1c14f1569f7da2fd0acf4738771be1eb1096f1d
Pierre,
This will still need a minor version bum
On 12/03/2017 11:06 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> Why was the conflict 'php-mcrypt<=7.1' added to php? It now seeks to
> remove php56-mcrypt. I require both for older web apps not yet ported to
> php7. These packages do not conflict as I have used both for a couple of
> years. Now I get:
All,
Why was the conflict 'php-mcrypt<=7.1' added to php? It now seeks to
remove php56-mcrypt. I require both for older web apps not yet ported to
php7. These packages do not conflict as I have used both for a couple of
years. Now I get:
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies
I'm back on this topic, because I have news.
On 11/21/2017 09:18 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>
> This is example of wishful thinking and misunderstanding what our
> requirements are. Reporting anything on Bugzilla isn't different from
> using Flyspray, and we're far from "the most friendly d
On 03-12-17 09:25, Newbugreport via arch-general wrote:
My Arch server hit https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10541 in a bad
way, blocking all SMB writes from my Ubuntu 17.10 client. Since the bug is
unfixed, I'd like to make a custom build of smbd to get things working. My test
builds
My Arch server hit https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10541 in a bad
way, blocking all SMB writes from my Ubuntu 17.10 client. Since the bug is
unfixed, I'd like to make a custom build of smbd to get things working. My test
builds of samba don't appear to match how samba is built in Arch
6 matches
Mail list logo
