On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
>
> Have you ever considered to make use of professional psychological help?
> Nearly each of your replies, whomsoever you answer, has got a
> condescending tone. It's funny for the reader, if you make a fool of
> yourself, but I suspect being
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:03:36 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>On 04/24/2017 08:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> downgrades happen from time to time.
>
>When they do, it is a bug. Why on earth do you think epoch exists
>anyway?
They might happen unintended, but all downgrades from offici
On 04/24/2017 08:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> downgrades happen from time to time.
When they do, it is a bug. Why on earth do you think epoch exists anyway?
Note: custom packages are tangential to this thread, please vent elsewhere.
--
Eli Schwartz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 04/24/2017 08:06 PM, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
> Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than
> community (0.15.0-2)" ?
File a bugreport, the version in staging/testing (which was part of the
openssl 1.1 rebuild) was older than the new version which was pushed t
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 02:06:59 +0200, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
>Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than
>community (0.15.0-2)" ?
Hi,
downgrades happen from time to time.
From official repositories I manually downgraded
[2017-04-25 01:22] [ALPM] downgraded op
Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than
community (0.15.0-2)" ?
6 matches
Mail list logo
