On 03/12/2017 02:59 PM, Jason Ryan via arch-general wrote:
>> I've never had problems before, but haven't posted in months, what to try?
>>
> Searching: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=220394
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=220738
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?i
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 19:35:00 +0800
Robert Wong via arch-general wrote:
> Not knowing what your problem exactly is... But after seeing your missing
> file, I
> would say the problem could have something to do with the NVIDIA driver... I
> advice you to search the repo for package that contains thi
On 12/03/17 at 02:52pm, David C. Rankin wrote:
All,
Attempting to post details to
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=224028 from FF 45.8esr, I get:
Bad HTTP_REFERER. You were referred to this page from an unauthorized source.
If the problem persists please make sure that 'Base URL' is
All,
Attempting to post details to
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=224028 from FF 45.8esr, I get:
Bad HTTP_REFERER. You were referred to this page from an unauthorized source.
If the problem persists please make sure that 'Base URL' is correctly set in
Admin/Options and that you are
On 03/12/2017 10:36 AM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote:
> On 12-03-2017 14:00, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This
>> server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting
>> to
>> sync zones:
On 12-03-2017 14:00, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This
> server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting to
> sync zones:
It seems other people also have noticed problems:
https://bbs.archli
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:36:48 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Should I open a bug, and if so, which package do I open it under?
There already is one, has been for a couple of days
On 03/12/2017 09:24 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> There is a BIG bug in one of those upgrades -- but which one?
>
If it helps, I had individually downgraded the following and tested, but
named remained broken until I backed out the block of packages containing the
kernel and gcc. I had individ
On 03/12/2017 09:00 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> For some reason the 'libseccomp sandboxing active' command never issues and
> /etc/named.conf is never processed. I have not touched the configuration here
> in a "long long time..."
>
> Is this a kernel bug, a libseccomp bug, what?
Uugh...
All,
After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This
server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting to
sync zones:
# rndc -V sync --clean
create memory context
create socket manager
create task manager
create task
create logging context
s
10 matches
Mail list logo
