Re: [arch-general] sandboxing

2017-02-06 Thread Bart De Roy via arch-general
Based on the given links and comments I could not decide on a clear course of action. If only we w'd have continuous builds of Chromium in the Ozone-Wayland implementation. Buying a Chromebook may not be the worst idea after all. At least this sounds promising: https://youtu.be/4PflCyiULO4?t=2h31

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

2017-02-06 Thread Kyle Laker
Sorry, I thought I had gotten a successful build in my attempts, but I apparently was mistaken. I certainly got the sources to download, though. In any case, I apologize that the patch I provided was incomplete and not thoroughly tested. I appreciate the work you did to get a successful update of t

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

2017-02-06 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since >> 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can result in >> runtime warnings for some JavaFX