[arch-general] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose?

2017-01-08 Thread Magnus Therning
Hi all, Well, the subject line says it all really. Does ArchHaskell still have a role in the Arch world? These are the reasons for asking this at this point: - the Haskell packages in [community] now number more than 400 and there is considerable overlap with ArchHaskell (unfortunately it's n

Re: [arch-general] Arch install broken by invalid signatures (anthraxx) using 201610 iso

2017-01-08 Thread Matthew Dyer via arch-general
Hi, Just had this happen to me durring an update to the system. I did the following to fix this. sudo pacman-key -refreshkeys. Not sure how this works when installing from the images, but after refreshing the keys, updateing the system works without a problem. HTH. Matthew On 01/08

Re: [arch-general] Stable 4.8 series and 4.9

2017-01-08 Thread Bruno Pagani via arch-general
Le 08/01/2017 à 16:25, Phil Wyett via arch-general a écrit : > Hi, Hi, > Could someone guide me to any doc on kernel update / version change > policy for arch? I think the only policy is not release if they are critical bugs. Else, see e.g. this thread, same time of the year, same thing: https:

[arch-general] Stable 4.8 series and 4.9

2017-01-08 Thread Phil Wyett via arch-general
Hi, Could someone guide me to any doc on kernel update / version change policy for arch? I see we have a 4.8.16 released but not built for arch and 4.9.1 (in testing) that is, but still early in its release cycle. Regards Phil -- Play the game, for the games sake. OS of choice: Arch / Anterg